My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
09-14-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 9:58:40 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 9:57:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />11. #15-3772 ROBERT MILLER, 60 SMITH AVENUE, VARIANCES — RESOLULTION NO. <br />6539 (continued) <br />Printup stated he also does not want to hold the application up since he is not sure what it will solve. <br />McMillan stated her only concern is the massing on the north side and that she hopes the neighbors <br />continue to have dialogue. McMillan stated the applicant is entitled to a functional second story and that <br />she is hopeful the addition will not impact the view of the neighbor to the north. <br />Walsh moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6539, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 (B), for the property located at 60 Smith <br />Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />12. #15-3775 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING TEMPORARY <br />SIGNS <br />Barnhart stated the City's current ordinance regulating signs does not meet the needs of charitable <br />organizations or for community events. The existing ordinance does allow a conditional use permit once <br />every two years. As Staff and the City Attorney reviewed the ordinance closer, it became evident that <br />many of the signs are regulated based on their content, a direct violation of state statute, which allows <br />regulation based only on time, place and manner. <br />In response, the conditional use permit requirement was removed and now requires only a Staff issued <br />permit provided the sign meets certain criteria. Signs in commercial districts have the same number of <br />signage opportunities as before, but they will get an additional sign if they allow their property to be used <br />for charitable, community event signage. <br />The proposed ordinance amends the sign ordinance in several ways and achieves the following goals: <br />Allow temporary signs that meet certain parameters in the right-of-way jurisdiction only and City <br />property following a permit. <br />2. Allow temporary signs in commercial zones for a specific period of time and allow additional <br />signage for commercially zoned properties that provide signage for charitable organizations. <br />3. Amend the ordinance to reflect recent Supreme Court rulings on free speech. <br />4. Give the City authority to display any sign within its own right-of-way or property. <br />Barnhart noted signs in residential zones are subject to certain sign limitations regardless of message. In <br />addition, the City must issue a permit for signs in the right-of-way and on city property regardless of the <br />message. The City may not issue permits for county or state right-of-ways, including County Roads 15, <br />19, 51 and Highway 12. <br />Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance as presented. <br />Walsh asked what the alternative would be. <br />Page 30 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.