Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock pm. <br />12. #15-3766 CITY OF ORONO, AMEND CITY CODE RELATING TO AVERAGE <br />LAKESHORE SETBACK (continued) <br />The average Lakeshore setback is intended to address visual massing impacts to adjacent properties by <br />requiring improvements on lakeshore lots to be behind adjacent residential structures. Where there is not <br />two adjacent residential structures, Staff applies the setback of the adjacent structure, or 75 feet, <br />whichever is greater. <br />Barnhart noted the average lakeshore setback was deemed a high priority item during the November, <br />2014, joint work session, and that he is looking for input from the City Council. <br />Printup indicated he is okay with this ordinance. <br />Walsh stated it seems to be making it pretty tight. Walsh asked if he is talking about the 0 -75 -foot line. <br />Barnhart indicated it is. <br />Walsh stated he just wanted to make sure it was not 75 feet beyond the 75 -foot line. <br />Levang asked what would happen in the case where there is a residence on the immediately adjacent <br />improved lakeshore lot but that residence is abandoned. <br />Barnhart stated it is whether there is a residential structure on the property regardless of whether it is <br />occupied or not. Barnhart noted Staff also recommends deletion of the clause that grants the planning <br />director discretion to approve a project if the setback cannot be met, the lake views of adjacent lots are not <br />obstructed, and with adjacent neighbor's approval. Barnhart noted this clause was applied five or fewer <br />times over the last ten years. <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO., THIRD SERIES, an Ordinance <br />Amending the Orono Municipal Code by Amending Section 78-1279 Regarding Average Lakeshore <br />Setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />13. AMEND RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION OFFENSES <br />Barnhart stated in December of 2013, the Council approved an ordinance amendment that provided for <br />administrative offenses, certain offenses that may be subject to an administrative fine, in addition to the <br />normal citation process. That ordinance requires the Council to determine offenses eligible for <br />administrative citations by resolution. <br />Barnhart stated Staff is recommending the Council add four different offenses to the list. Those include <br />grass and weeds, vacant buildings, damaged buildings, and expired building permits. Barnhart stated <br />identifying certain offenses as an administrative citation strengthens the code enforcement toolbox and <br />helps to improve the resolution rate. <br />Staff recommends approval. <br />Walsh asked who is going to make the determination on what long grass is or what a damaged building is. <br />Page 27 of 32 <br />