My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1983 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1983
>
03-21-1983 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 4:23:05 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 4:20:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />1980 - PAGE 2 <br />FRED RYAN <br />1345 No. Arm Dr. <br />VACATION <br />Public Hearing <br />(#544) Cont. <br />m <br />FRANK ROUTSON <br />280 Leaf Street <br />SUBDIVISION <br />(#405) <br />JOHN ALBERS <br />1111 Tamarac)c Dr. <br />COND. USE PERMIT <br />(#547) <br />m y <br />C. ARNOLD CARLSON <br />855 Forest Arms <br />Lane <br />BLDG. PLAN REVIEW <br />(#549) <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON APRIL 21, 1980 - PAGE 3 <br />Wilson moved to recommend that the Village recognize <br />Lot 5 as a riparian lot on the condition the Carlsons <br />enter into a restrictive agreement with Orono in <br />resolution form specifying that any dock be parallel <br />to lakeshore and not encroach into channel 10* with <br />the condition that no more than two boats (any length) <br />be moored at the dock. Motion seconded by Frahm. <br />ARNOLD CARLSON <br />855 Forest Arms <br />Lane <br />BLDG. PLAN REVIEW <br />(#549) Cont. <br />In discussion it was questioned whether the size of <br />the boats should be addressed. Jabbour, Hannah and <br />McDonald felt it was too restrictive. <br />Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously <br />ma <br />Wilson also moved to recommend to Council that steps <br />be taken through notification of record against Lot 7, <br />Block 2, that the City of Orono does not consider this <br />a riparian lot. Motion seconded by Jabbour. <br />There was discussion as to whether this conflicts with <br />the final plat approval - had it previously been <br />recognized as riparian? After discussion, it was agreed <br />that this lot could in no way comply with the LMCD <br />Ordinances in constructing a dock. Hannah and McDonald <br />were originally opposed to the motion, but now agreed <br />with the other members that according to the ordinance <br />what you definitively end up with is a 1* dock space <br />after the required 15* side setback is met on each side. <br />The Planning Commission requested that the oximers of <br />Lot 7, Mathias and Raymond Fischer be notified that <br />this issue is before the Council. Vote: Ayes (6), <br />Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. <br />V-’ <br />■. •• .‘V, <br />Wilson vacated his seat as Mr. Johnston is a client of <br />his firm. This item had been discussed at the previous <br />meeting and was being returned for a formal recommendation. <br />Hannah moved to recommend solidification of the proposed <br />land trade between the City and H.R. Johnston. Planning <br />Commission conceptually approves of the land trade based <br />on the applicant*s proposed subdivision making efficient <br />use of the entire land peninsula but noting that a final <br />decision cannot be made until the M.W.C.C. determines <br />what portions of the sewer facility are to be retained. <br />Motion seconded by Frahm. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />H. R. JOHNSTON <br />925 Willow Dr. So <br />LAND TRADE <br />(#550) <br />¥ <br />it'’ <br />REGULAR ME <br />3. Surrot <br />simile <br />aware <br />Planning C <br />The Planni <br />permit anc <br />recommendc <br />Council M( <br />Paurus moi <br />condition! <br />' John D. A! <br />Planning ( <br />of approvi <br />Motion, A: <br />Jeanne Mai <br />into the : <br />855 Fores <br />dated Apr. <br />Mr. Carlsi <br />riparian . <br />Block 2, ; <br />construct <br />26* X 10* <br />property ’ <br />ten years <br />approval. <br />In review <br />Commissio <br />issue for <br />been deci <br />Commissio <br />Council m <br />resolved <br />be mainly <br />drainage <br />park fees <br />Council M <br />Mr. 6 Mrs <br />Butler me <br />to draft <br />permit fc <br />stating t <br />and does <br />the chanr <br />Motion, P
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.