My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-1984 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1984
>
09-17-1984 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 3:01:49 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 2:58:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Yes, I wc'uld cr'ice r>ciain concur wi tJi tlie firuJings. <br />^ HGDdtr.-i.?.L.?L'r' hc.id3!?5 i?l3Dy yQCtd §bQce <br />PcLJiS &b^dyyL'Qd b-9sid ICQOtifjQ i A6 [^?ipr£'CAA35 <br />.1 cosily cgmhined on two or niore Igt^. cguj^d geel thg <br />di vi si on wi th yar i c*ncgs i f t hi§ f?L‘f?l t L90 ).5 i*Pr!C9y3d i C2§L'1~ <br />iii-OQ ID 14? D§'y CD§id5'Dr.£!^ C-cy-‘*iE?l <br />W- hrwo l.fon ad'/isc-d by the City Attorney in previous <br />reviews th^t nc»gative precedent setlirig is an acceptcible -factor — <br />exactly the opposite held set forth by applicant s attc»rney - <br />City ALtor’iiey to iitost definitely respond to this one. <br />— n very pr el i nti nar y re.'ic-w cit the C'wi n•*■r chi p* pattefns <br />the LR-IC district mIjovg Navarre area (see Exhibits E, F, and <br />of <br />G> <br />sliows 14»'. Of 43 properties offer" the poteritial <br />this appi 1 1 cat 1 on is afiproved. <br />divisions i -f <br />Ra.'Tio as ahcwe. <br />6 - <br />a) <br />Bcyiiti' ^DCtiQD i2t'l?di.yi5iDn <br />IL't^ pri^'t'^fCLy ID 3DI'^l-.l DD DT'Dd ^ CD5?d&Dt iDl <br />unit receiving tax henetits j or a iDinj.mun of 30 yeac <br />The nnileyel oped Lot 3 is taxed on arj IDLL oment a,l bas^Sj <br />not as a bull dabie lot. <br />Same as my response 2 <br />b) The yranlfng of such yariaricc-s ^H-juld change <br />Sb^CsPllC Dt tt'.e immediate surrounding neighborhood.. <br />the <br />6 -G) CJnre again ttie pattern of nc'i ghborhoed development has <br />no place in a subdivision re-.-iew ttiat creates a riew residential <br />unit. The standards of the LP-IC .’oning district apply. If <br />variances are to be approved vrith sutid i vi si ofis thr.^n 16 new r esi- <br />dential units would be a possibility - most of them rec|Uiring lot <br />line rear rangem<»nts not just divisions for tax purposes. <br />All of ilio abC'VC'. I will see if 1 can get the City Attorney <br />to give me some bad (jround on Frank ’s Nursery Gales Inc. vs City <br />(if Roseville .*iid Ijirvan vs Court of Le Bueur . Right now "special <br />treatment" a{>ps*ars vagu€^ with 1 1111direct luri or applicatioti in <br />tfi 1 6 revi ew. <br />"7 ~ opPCCycl DA itli5 yiiCidnCD i'D3 fj'JbtJiyision appl location <br />ynyld by iu CCTjtLict. with the intent of the ?nning <br />Q9(DDCP'b?nsi ye Ri an of the Ci.tyi <br />PI ar^i ng <br />Code and <br />Commission Action <br />First “ 1 would recommend that we advise both attoriiey and <br />applicant that tliey seel, approval of both a subdivision arid <br />multifile variarice'i. The Cit / tias yet to ask tricson to file a <br />separate application for a dc*vision of property. <br />< i <br />"1 i <br />r <br />.j ‘
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.