Laserfiche WebLink
At the* f-’l cuini iiij Ca<»imi sti ori rueetiri*^ of Aftrjl lt>, 1 VH*4. <br />LricGon .isl cd hli.^t tfif^ .ipf) 1 j r. ^ 11 on ti<> tf^hlr-d providinq odditinnsi <br />time for him to rovicjw the application with hisi attt>riif?y and -for <br />his attorney to prepare a response to tin* City's positiori. <br />Review of Attorney's Response: <br />1 <br />wi th <br />pr ec edc-nt. <br />- To approve l(tt area and lot width v^'ianccs concurrent <br />a subcJi S'l SI on application would establish a neaative <br />Since Hie passage of our tormal plattinq and roning code in <br />lVt)7, the City has ned approved lot ar «*a or lot width v£tr i ai ices <br />of this magni tudi* with any snbdi.-ision apjil i c .*t i on invol'.inq the <br />creation ot new residerit units. Itiis is pr i m.^r i J y a subdivision <br />application - your code classifies a division f oi la;; purposes as <br />a Class I Riihdi . 1 si on F Soctirjfi 11.0 <br />a d] vic.,ion f OI t a;; <br />03 <a) ,(?»- <br />th‘? O;. t C ‘n t of 1 heI don't Hniit I i,t:ed revirw <br />data repi.-ated t tuouqtir •ut the c om|ir ehensi ve plan an<l ronirig code <br />ttiat supiports the de-nsities for the various 1 al eshore zoning <br />districts — operi <-pace, qual 11 y/quant 11 y of runot f , uriiqueness of <br />watertitieri of Late Minntcrda, etc, itc. And, 1 tnow ttierp are <br />those who wcuild conterifl tl.at these env 1 ronmentt^ 1 standards or <br />claims are vague and less impfessive whe-n dealing with ttie actual <br />patterns of nei ghbrtr hood devel opiiient but until ttie City decides <br />tc mate major re*visicins or amendments to the comprehensive plan <br />and nc*riing code, ’he well founded eri. i roineut al positicin of our* <br />City must he ujitield. Clearly, wo are uot dr-alinq with 0>erg <br />aesttietics lu ttiis revieir. <br />2 - Itie a(ip] leant tia'. received tar: bermfits from the <br />ccmib 1 flat i fin of lets 3 *1 over the years since ttie 194C* s. <br />1 eqal <br />Ac {'I evirais nicnm? tiave noted, soiiio ten ',ears ago assc-ssirig <br />policies diet inderd provide greater hr-nef i ts to owners of legally <br />combined homestead properties. ha/tu- we should clarify thcit the <br />Erxeson's received tar. beriefits during their pf>r i od of owru-^r sti i p. <br />Ttie attorney stiould er.plain his sl.:«Lemerit "tliat ttie County, <br />QD its pyt' iOCt.L^'ti^fj altered ttu? ta;;es or' the properties" the <br />county i:cMiil> 1 iicd ttie lots without permission of the owner? On <br />what infor'mation does tu* male such claims'* I am not able to f i rid <br />it in tti*' i II f or niu t i cm pad et subiiiitted with tus report. <br />3 ~ Ti.e total property has been used as one- <br />residf?ntial unit bated ori location of the garage, access <br />sewer line ttiat sc-rvc'"? existing house. <br />single <br />dr 1ve, <br />1 . <br />• <br />V • <br />*1. <br />The garnije is 1 cheated iiu ttie shared lot liiie. <br />Ttie houre is 3 feet from ttie shared lot line. <br />Ttie driveway accesses via lot J to serve liousc <br />on 1 t>t ^. <br />Aewur line runs, througti lot 3 to reach lot '1. <br />pe l l| <br />■/