05-21-1984 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

nee n made to substandard nee anee ed this olution #1281 e on of travelled rvey. (This I reeommend north 18 ft ea beeomes 8 sq ft exists the building mum hardeover ft. within the is subjeet ot. $6,201.45 f whieh the d by County). 73-1 assessment, ng permit as the lot. eed aeross ing permit 9 or less other ding rmit building ¥ i ♦ t r, a li „ ■): ■ I t V-. ' : t i ■ i- IM L,m MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 Page 3 Hammerel - He felt that the applieant's engineer's report showed no eredibility toward the applieant and also that this was the seeond tim^he has come in with an "after the fact" application. ® SPEETER (CONT.) McDonald - She stated that she didn't know how an attorney could do all this construction and not know that he didn't need a permit. Also this was his second time. Roveqno - His concerns were with the lake. He is not in favor of man-made drainage ways if they can use natural drainage. He felt that the flume wasn't the property drainage way. He suggested that the applicant get the necessary permits for the gazebo too. Applicant was present. Mabusth noted that no setback variance*^TEVEN CODDON would be permitted. Applicant stated that he understood and that there was no problem. Some neighbors were present from the audience: Mr. Meagher of 3980 Dahl Road; and Mr. and Mrs. Roger Hegg of 1034 Loma Linda. The Hegg's were concerned with the substandard lot. They also questioned the survey, which they thought was incorrect. They stated that there was a 4^' space between west end of their property, 1' on the north and 2' on the east. They stated that their surveyor's survey was different from their's. They stated that in that 4^' space there were elm trees and they wanted to know who's side they were on. Planning Commission suggested that the neighbors have each others surveyors get together and decide which side the elm trees are on. 4015 Dahl Road Variance #658 Rovegno moved to approve the area and lot width variance application for Steven Coddon subject to the following findings and conditions: 1 - The owner conveying to the City a quit claim deed for road right of way purposes over, under and across the north 18' of the property prior to building permit issuance. 2 - All buildings to be located within the building envelope shown on the attached sketch. 3 - Maximum hardcover on the lot to be 4227 sf or less including buildings, driveways, patios, decks, etc. 4 - No current or future variances granted for any other performance standards requirements. 5 - Payment of standard building permit fees including SAC and park dedication fee at the time the permit is issued. 6 - Payment of $1,081.45 sewer hookup charge with building permit. 7 - Conservation and*flowage easements - to be reviewed by staff. Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). r:. JITY of O UfTic* Be a 66«Cry«lal II . .... r 4 • Steven Coddoi 4015 Dahl Ro< Mound, MN 55: NOTICE OF PLA] Date of Meetii Votes; Planning Comm Appre Appre Appre Deni< Table Table No ac NOTES AND SPEC approval of v of conditions Applicant Applicant additiona meeting i for the In all cases, requested info or the City wi If the applies contact the Zo If you desire they are avai and approval