05-21-1984 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

... .. ■ . '-H » • ••••.'• • . •• • • • •• •. « • .• • •• • TO: V • • • * Planning Conmissipn,*- j. EXHIBIT FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Alan P. Olson *• •• •• ^ October 16, 1981 #658 Steven Coddon, 4015 Dahl Road - Variance This is a lot area and lot width variance application made to permit construction of a new single family home on a substandard lot of record. DISTRICT LR-IB. LOT AREA .39 AC vs 1.0 AC Required LOT WIDTH 128 FT VS 140 FT Required 61% variance • 8.5% variance The lot became tax forfeit this year. It was reviewed this spring. The Council released the lot for sale by Resolution #1281 adopted June 8, 1981. It was purchased at a tax sale on September 25, 1981. • The gross lot area is 19,212 sq ft = .44 acre. Part of travelled Dahl Road encroaches into the lot as shown on the survey. (This was not know at the time of the tax forfeit review). I recommend that additional right of way be establi.shed over the north 18 ft of the lot. Using this right of way, the net lot area becomes 16,908 sq ft * .39 acre. A building envelope of 7128 sq ft exists which meets all LR-lB setback requirements. Because the building envelope is within 250 ft of the shoreline, the maximum hardcover permitted would be 25% of the net lot area = 4227 sq ft. A home can easily be built within this envelope and within the maximum hardcover. The occupied lot just west of this subject is exactly the same size. This lot was assessed 1 sewer unit in the 73-1 project. $6,201.45 remained unpaid at forfeiture. The sale was $6400 of which the City will get about 80%, or $5120 (not yet finalized by County). Thus there is a likely shortfall of $1081.45 for the 73-1 assessment. I recommend that this amount be paid with the building permit as a hookup charge. There is a sewer stub existing for the lot. I recommend variance approval subject to: 1) The owner conveying to the City a quit claim deed for road right of way purposes over, under and across the north 18 ft of the property prior to building permit issuance. All buildings to be located within the building envelope shown on the attached sketch. Maximum hardcover on the lot to be 4227 sq ft or less including buildings, driveways, patios, etc. No current or future variances granted for any other performance standards requirement. Payment of standard building permit fees including SAC and park dedication fee at the time the permit is issued. Payment of $1081.45 sewer hookup charge with building permit. 2) 3) 4) 5) f • i Si -Sil i i MINUTES OP THE Hammerel - He f showed no credi this was the se fact” applicati McDonald - She could do all th a permit. Also Roveqno - His c favor of man-ma drainage. He f drainage way. necessary perml Applicant was ] would be permi' and that there from the audiei and Mrs. Roger concerned with the survey, wh; that there was property, 1* oi that their sur^ They stated the and they wantec Commission sug< surveyors get i are on. Rovegno moved 1 application foi findings and cc 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - The owner < for road ri across the building pc All buildir envelope s) Maximum hai less indue decks, etc. No current other perfc Payment of SAC and pax is issued. 6 - 7 - Payment of building pc Conservati( by staff. Goetten secondc