My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
06-12-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2023 1:49:04 PM
Creation date
6/27/2023 1:45:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA23-000020 <br />May 15, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: <br />LR-1B District Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ <br />Actual 25,300 s.f. (0.58 acre) 111’ @ 75’ / 111’ @ OHWL <br /> <br /> <br />Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: <br />Stormwater <br />Overlay District <br />Tier <br />Total Area Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Tier 1 25,300 s.f. 6,325 s.f. <br />(25 %) <br />4,829 s.f. <br />(19.1%) <br />5,034 s.f. <br />(19.9%) <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) <br />The intent of the ordinance is to protect the lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties. Structures over <br />42 inches in height are prohibited in front of the average lakeshore setback line. This line is measured <br />from the most lakeward point of each neighboring home or structure. The existing deck on the subject <br />property is in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Expansion of this deck is not permitted without a <br />variance as the deck is over 42 inches in height. The subject property is oriented in a way that the existing <br />deck and proposed deck expansion does not impact the lake views for either the neighbor to the north or <br />the south. The neighbor’s views of the lake are protected and therefore the intent of the ordinance is met. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br />variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br />light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br />area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br />provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend <br />approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical <br />difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br />systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, <br />subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any <br />use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a <br />two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The average <br />lakeshore setback variance is required for the expansion of a lakeside deck. The current deck is <br />within the average lakeshore setback and therefore expansion would not be permitted. The <br />intent of the ordinance is to preserve and protect lake views enjoyed from neighboring <br />properties. The neighboring properties to the north and south are positioned in a way that the <br />existing deck and the proposed expansion does not impact views of the lake. The requested <br />expansion of approximately 205 square feet is minimal, does not impact lake views, and <br />increases enjoyment of the subject property. This criterion is met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.