Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br />de Setback <br />quired - 50' <br />St side - 30' <br />St side - 160' <br />house but there <br />house. The <br />g front line of <br />ncroachment into <br />e of 4740 Bayside Road <br />realign north-south <br />ate area to solve <br />(Exhibit F) will <br />house? There is <br />St and north on the <br />site, will there be <br />hibit L. The area <br />change in lot width, <br />jilding envelope <br />cf the normal rural <br />purchase of a parcel <br />nd 49' wide along <br />lanning Commission <br />npromise not wishing <br />a charity case <br />^e Planning Commission <br />2 consistent with <br />Ln size v/ith the <br />Lde Road. More <br />2ds. The addition <br />1 for lots of <br />L district per <br />■ -i <br />h <br />■ Mrf. <br />m <br />#722 - Ski Tonka, Inc. March 10, 1983 Page 4 <br />31.203. In "R" Districts of Greater Than One Acre. A lot of <br />record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, <br />which does not meet the requirements of this Zoning Code as to <br />area or width only, may be utilized for single family detached <br />dwelling purposes if the Council finds: <br />1) it is at least one acre in size, and the average width <br />of the lot is at least 100 feet; and <br />2) it is either served by public sanitary sewer or meets all <br />the septic system requirements of the City or other government <br />body; and <br />♦ <br />3) it otherwise meets the requirements of this or other applicable <br />ordinances. <br />c) Four Acre Addition <br />Mr. Oberhauser has stated for the record all of the reasons for <br />requiring a four-acre addition (review Exhibit I). I do not think <br />that we need sketch such a plan for your review; needless to say, <br />it will bring 4740 Bayside Road well within the RR-lZ zoning <br />standards. <br />Staff Recommenda' ion <br />As I recommended to the Planning Commission, ask that a minimum of one <br />acre be set aside for the future use of the property located at 4740 <br />Bayside Road, (similar to the one acre outlet set' aside in the <br />Victoria Estates plat for the one acre lot with an existing house) . <br />The City should not concern itself with the purchase of that land. <br />Primus/Ski Tonka, Inc. must file for a subdivision creating a one-plus <br />acre outlet for the exclusive use of 4740 Bayside Road. The total <br />two acre area will now be consistent with minimum lot standards for <br />rural residential development. Staff has confirmed adequate and <br />suitable area for future setpic needs. I could not agree more with <br />Mr. Oberhauser*s position but I have offered a practical solution in <br />light of the findings of this review, the objectives lUV' intent of the <br />zoning code and the nature of an after the fact applic .r )n. <br />Council Action <br />Give conceptual direction to staff so that a resolution may be presented <br />for Council action at your next meeting. Advise the applicant that <br />he need not wait for formal action on the variance application to file <br />for a lot line rearrangement subdivision with the City. The application <br />must be filed by Tuesday, March 29, 1983 to enable staff to call for <br />a public hearing at the April 18, 1983 meeting of the Planning Commission <br />wmm:: <br />.