03-19-1984 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

nka property history of the original dth variance aimon ownership orth. ve been very Naturally, operty. They to purchase asked the uring the review lat they could 2sponsibility to af 4740 Bayside not be of Ls area will Ldential uses 1 acquiring existing :he City that : that is subject lot area of i located ' a sketch. in a garden/ •lete as it did ^as required, area for he north. Dunn property find the exist- further v/est the inter- prevents a Required - 109' Existing - 30' #722 - Ski Tonka, March 10, 1983 Page 3 Inc.The setbacks of the existing house'are as follows: Setback Rear Setback Side Setback Required - 100' Existing - 140' Required - 50' East side - 30’ West side - 160 There can be no future expansion to the east of the house but there may be expansion on the north and v/est side of the house. The expansion to the west must extend along the existing front line of the house. The City could not permit any further encroachment into the 30' front yard. How much area should be set aside for the future use of 4 740 Bayside Road a) 49' X 218’ corridor along north property line (realign north-south dimension to match lot to immediate east) (Exhibit H) confirms that this is adequate area to solv’e all future septic needs. Per Oberhauser letter (Exhibit F) will this corridor permit expansion of the existing house? There is adequate area now to permit expansion to the west and north on the house. If a new house were to be built on the site, will there be an adequate sized building envelope? Review Exhibit L. The area of the lot IS 52,756 sq. ft. or 1.2 acres - no change in lot width. A building envelope of 118’ X 42' - a limited building envelope for the RR-IA zoning district in consideration of the normal rural uses of Such lots. The applicant and the Dunns have discussed the purchase of a parcel running 20' wide along the west property line and 49' wide along the north property line (see Exhibit M). The Planning Commission approved the acquisition finding this a fair compromise not wishing to create financial burden on the Dunns or make a charity case for Primus. Review Exhibit J, the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 7, 1983. One Acre Addition Review Exhibit N. The building envelope is more consistent with rural residential uses. The lot is consistent in size v/ith the RR-IB zoning district on the south side of Bayside Road. More than adequate area to meet all future septic needs. The addition of one acre would satisfy the standards setforth for lots of single separate ownership in a rural residential district per Ordinance 31. 203. **■ 'f i: 1. m * #722 - March Page 4 31 re wh ar dw 1) 2) Fo Mr re th it st Staff As I r acre b Baysid Victor The Ci Primus acre o two ac rural suitab Mr. Ob light zoning Counci