Laserfiche WebLink
i021 <br />.DOLLARS <br />PL <br />8. <br />10. <br />11. <br />o T%.t <br />>•5 <br />DESCRIBE REQUEST. First, request variance to add bay <br />window to north side of house extending house out 2 <br />feet beyond present eave and 8 feet wide, for an additional <br />16 sq. ft. of hardcover in an area where one corner of <br />proposed addition would be 75 feet from lake, but other <br />corner of proposed addition would be only 65 feet from <br />lake. The encroachment within the 75 foot limit would <br />therefore amount to only about 8 sq. ft. <br />Second, request variance to cover previously screened <br />porch which would add an additional 267 sq. ft. of <br />hardcover in an area within 75 feet of lake. <br />UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS. This lot is over 1 acre <br />in size including wetland; the high ground excluding <br />the wetland is over 1/2 acre. The house is about 2,600 <br />sq. ft. in size all according to the survey attached. <br />The lot area covered by the house is only 5.3% of the <br />entire lot area and is only 11.4% of the high ground <br />excluding the wetland. Therefore the size of the lot <br />compared to the high ground is very small at 11.4% <br />compared to the 25% permitted let cover in Zone LR-IA <br />at the distances of 75 feet to 250 feet from the lake. <br />Because of the peninsular characteristic of this land, <br />no portion of the land is more than 250 feet from the <br />lake; but also because of the configuration of the <br />peninsula, much of the land is within 75 feet of the <br />Jake. The additions requested of 16 sq. ft. and 267 <br />sq. ft. increase the hardcover percentage from 11.4% to <br />only 12.6%. This house was built in approximately <br />1947 and so the general condition with regard to this <br />house and its proximity to the lake has been in existence <br />for many, many years. Were this property and this <br />house configured in a more normal circumstance, there <br />would be no difficulty whatsoever in meeting any of the <br />setback requirements. See example attached. <br />UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY. As with many <br />older lake houses, this one was built at a time when <br />houses were very small. This house has been rented for <br />a number of years by the present owner and its substandard <br />interior dimensions were not clearly known to him. The <br />house is only a 3-bedroom house with a small two car <br />garage, living room, kitchen, and diriing nook. The <br />purpose of the addition to the north side of the house <br />is to expand the dining nook from a size which in <br />reality only allows two people to eat in the dining <br />area to one which would allow six people to eat in the <br />dining area. The nev; hardcover beyond the existing <br />eave is only 16 sq. ft. <br />A porch which does not have an impermeable roof is just <br />a great nuisance because porch furniture cannot be left <br />on the porch - a real chore as a practical matter. It is <br />® hardship to require them to carry in and out porch <br />furniture cushions each time they wish to use the <br />porch. The owner proposes that the run-off from a roof <br />over the screen porch be channeled into a sump or cistern <br />conti'^uous to the house to be held in the sump and only <br />released therefrom slowly such that as a practical <br />matter there would be no substantial increase in the <br />__rvf__TLlirL —jnHFjf __oJF __rvaJuri __UfjaJh_£>jr__irjrs_________________________________________________