My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-07-1976 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
09-07-1976 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2023 9:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/22/2023 9:47:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA <br />REGULAR PLANNING C(»WISSI(»I MEETING HELD AUGUST 16, 1976 <br />The Orono Planning Conmission met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Acting Chaiiman Gregg Hannah, <br />Members George Hosfield, John Hake, Gloria McDonald and <br />Zoning Administrator Hank Muhich. Gene Woolley arrived at <br />8:25 p.n. <br />ATIENDANCE - 7:50 P.M. <br />Acting Chairman Hannah announced that this was the time and <br />place for a Public Hearing on the petition of Gerald Parten <br />for a siAdivision of property located at 985 Tonkawa Road. <br />The toing Administrator presented the Notice of Public <br />Hearing and the Affadavit of Publication. <br />Hank Hdiich explained that the original proposal was to <br />subdivide the 5+ acres into three lots and that the Parten's <br />had changed this request to two lots both exceeding two <br />acres. Carl Parten, a brother of the petitioner and neigji- <br />bor to the south, was concerned about the swan^) area on the <br />rear lot. He felt that this wild area should not be <br />destroyed if a new road were built. Mrs. Gerald Parten <br />explained that the road to their property is already there. <br />Therefore, no new road is required on the south lot. Another <br />nei^ibor, Ken Weestrand, was concerned about the lake setbacks <br />for ffliy new homes that were built. He was concerned about <br />^ssible obstruction of his view. The Planning Commission <br />informed him that the lakeshore setback requirements are 75'. <br />The suggestiOT was made to try and line up the homes. After <br />all the public were heard the public hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m. <br />The Acting Chairman announced that this was the time and <br />place for a Public Hearing on the petition of Robert Niichel <br />for a subdivision of property located at 3175 Sixth Avenue N. <br />The Zoning Administrator presented the Notice of Public <br />Hearing and the Affadavit of Publication. <br />Hank Muhich stated that this petition is located in a 2 <br />acre zoning district and tiiat Mr. Niichel is requesting <br />approval of subdividing this parcel into 5 lots, each <br />exceeding five total acres. Mr. Muhich also informed the <br />Commission that he had received a letter from Donald Murphy <br />of Hennepin County regarding the proposed access to this <br />subdivision. The si^t distance required to safely enter <br />highway is 845' to the left. The actual sight distance to <br />the left is 450'. Because of this limited sight distance, <br />the County has reccminended that the proposed access be <br />relocated to a more safe location. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 7:50 P.M. <br />GERALD PARTEN <br />985 TONKAVA ROAD <br />SJBDmSKM (PRELIMINARY) <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 8:05 P.M. <br />ROBERT NIICHEL <br />3175 SIXTH AVENUE N. <br />SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.