My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 12:08:41 PM
Creation date
5/9/2023 12:01:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />April 17, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />Kraemer said it looks like a good addition to the property and getting hardcover lowered overall is good. <br /> <br />Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000008 1340 Vine Place, variances. VOTE: <br />Ayes: 6, Nays 0. <br /> <br />3. LA23-000014 SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON, 1007 WILDHURST TRAIL, <br />VARIANCE <br /> <br />City Planner Curtis said the application is to create a new lot at 1007 Wildhurst Trail. The existing home <br />and lot at 1003 Wildhurst would remain and is not part of this application. The applicant is in the process <br />of designing a new home for the 1007 lot. West Branch Road results in the average Lakeshore setback <br />line bisecting the center of the new lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance <br />to allow construction up to the 75-foot setback. Approval would be subject to the County approving the <br />lot line changes. The applicants have identified the unique lake channel orientation for both the new lot <br />and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch Road to the north as creating difficulties. Applicants <br />are in attendance. Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the properties along the <br />lakeshore channels create an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property which is <br />restricting development near the lake. Staff recommends the planning commission should discuss whether <br />the proposal fits within the character of neighborhood, whether practical difficulties exist, and. whether or <br />not there is any lake view impact to consider. Staff recommends approval. <br /> <br />Bollis clarified that the proposal would meet the 75-foot setback but it’s the average setback for which the <br />variance is being requested. <br /> <br />Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, said there are currently three PIDs on this property. There is a large, <br />undeveloped chunk of land I purchased when there was talk of putting seven or eight houses in there and <br />neighbors wanted to keep density lower. So in an effort to reduce the density of this area, my proposal <br />was to bring it down to two lots. And then in doing so, the average lakeshore setback gets connected from <br />the property to the north, and then connects to my own property that I also own. Average lakeshore <br />setback was intended to keep the relationship between neighbors and lake. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Kirchner said it reminded him of another case a few months ago. In reality, we are looking at a two-lot <br />application here, not a three-lot. <br /> <br />McCutcheon said if it was three we wouldn’t be talking about this. One house is extremely on the west <br />side but since they are combining, it’s a lakeshore lot. Where the house is located now it makes a lot of <br />sense. As you look at the neighborhood to the south they are all about that distance from the lake, so I <br />think it fits the character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Bollis said it goes back to the intent of the ordinance. I don’t think it creates an issue with sight lines. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.