My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 1:42:32 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 <br />(#9) #2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Willow Drive/Sixth Avenue North, Continued <br />Campion staled that the consensus of the Bancor Group is that they will not be able to proceed <br />forward with this development if it is reduced by more than four lots. Campion staled that they are <br />looking at approximately .85 dry buiidable acres per lot at this time, noting that the exact amount <br />of wetlands has not been defined. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented in his view his opinion regarding this parcel has changed somewhat <br />over the years due to changes in the community as well as the nevv proposed Highway 12 comdor. <br />Jabbour stated that according to City Code prior developers were given credit for vvellands when <br />City sewer was available. Jabbour commented in his opinion this property should be used as a <br />buffer zone. <br />Campion inquired whether the City Council would be requiring one acre lots for this development. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated this parcel should be developed as a PRD. with an average of one acre per <br />lot. <br />Kelley commented that he personally is not in favor of rezoriing this <br />the two aore zoning maintained. Kelley stated he would be in favor of a PRD with hvo acre zoning. <br />Peterson commented that she also is in agreement v;ith the two acre zoning. <br />Kelley stated that in his view the value of the property should be reduced in order to make this <br />development more economically feasible. <br />Campion stated they will need to address these issues further. <br />Gaffron commented that Sugarwocds was rezoned to one acre density. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented in his opinion the City should provide some »;'9her densi^housing <br />within the City and that the City Council should consider the possibility of rezoning this prop rty. <br />Kelley stated he would be in favcr of clustering units on this property wh^^ch <br />need to run sewer to a large number of residences. Kelley commented he wou i - <br />the two acre zoning for this area and is not in favor of higher density housing in this area. <br />Flint commented that he is troubled by the efforts to keep this area zoned a» <br />this is not a prime piece of real estate and that th.e school and County Road 6 do impact this <br />property. <br />Sansevere stated he is in agree.r.ent with Flint and that in his opinion this property could be <br />rezoned one acre dry buiidable <br />Campion stated that one acre dry buiidable would not allow their proposed development to work, <br />noting that the v/etlands and the streets need to be taken into account <br />favorable towards a development proposing a m.aximum of 44 units. <br />Sansevere commented that the developer is proposing upper middle class housing for this area, <br />Pagel0 •
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.