|
Date Application Received: 03/07/2023
<br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:03/15/2023 '[� l
<br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/17/2023 l�To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members '-Adam Edwards, CitY Administrator lit,v114,,...
<br /> N.From: Natalie Nye, Planner
<br /> Date: April 17, 2023
<br /> Subject: #LA23-000008, David Charlez Designs—David Zweber, 1340 Vine Place
<br /> Variances for Lot Area,Average Lakeshore Setback, 75-Foot Lakeshore Setback, Hardcover
<br /> within the 75-Foot Lakeshore Setback, and Rear Yard Setback- Public Hearing
<br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot
<br /> lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, and rear yard setback.
<br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval.
<br /> Background /. , •;- , , __—
<br /> The existing home on the property was / ., Ku-' ',A
<br /> constructed prior to current regulations and is . ,/ . r ° ' ;'Sa �� 1\�,\
<br /> I `,\ FOREST
<br /> nonconforming. Much of the existing home is �`+f ,,a ,, , `, /, 1 \\
<br /> located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback / L 0T/�'�3 / { . `
<br /> f 'i r J LAKE
<br /> % ' ,' : !1 ,1 / (LAKE MINNETONKA)
<br /> (noted in blue in Figure 1)and in front of the z- 'l,!!�r r , -
<br /> avers average lakeshore setback line (noted in red in „70/ fi:ill rl' r ,5 fin_
<br /> Figure 1).The compliant building envelope is z / �•.�., lfr,rr, Al \
<br /> o ,,,/
<br /> rr rr, / `^
<br /> not reasonably sized for the construction of a _ / ; ,0/ ,�i+ ,./ ; ':_\ °'.,
<br /> new home.The parcel is substandard in size at ,r 4; r � f/i/ if !',',. ;I -,,r1 / ,i,\ ` �
<br /> i L 0 i 'd'' 1 I I I ( 1 )- 1..fcxw.)
<br /> tt/ //1 // / 1 ,
<br /> 0.66 acres,where one acre is required. A lot �,., f',/;,;;�, � , ; :_ , ay� , �„ 1 �,-
<br /> ,�
<br /> k i
<br /> area variance is required for the reconstruction ���'�, ,�`x �,�; ;;'��'. � rF � ""`'
<br /> of the home.The applicant is proposing to tear a �'.',�f r l / /
<br /> down the existing home to the foundation and s
<br /> 'r,1 f 5rrtt; /
<br /> use the existing foundation to construct a new . l
<br /> } III ,,.
<br /> home. The proposed home larger and taller 'tik', , ,e j/ "(;,,°,� -^; \ ,1
<br /> oK' Ir' , �'I 1`
<br /> than the existing home,which is clearly ;' ^�°;Z,', '
<br /> �'
<br /> depicted is in the volume comparisons found in `" ;' ;S E � s .' ,/ ,
<br /> Exhibit G. The height difference is due to a o >' .:: "`
<br /> /Msq.Y /.,:4%,.._, / /, / �. / ,1 rem
<br /> steeper roof pitch and the addition of a second - , �' D if '""' �y ; 4• °
<br /> �,. /�. iao pItLW0.''6 d
<br /> sy,. i {�� GARAGE h� �/c ,+> !,.y�7' 4.'
<br /> •
<br /> story above portions of the home that were Wiz. <<o� - ___ ., -
<br /> once a single story. Also the applicant is Y y 7-fy'- 'i
<br /> ,
<br /> proposing to construct an attached three-car ._.. t I `` ,f� ►-' ■ +
<br /> garage while demolishing the existing two-car �"" " 5 ;,4 , %ba, �, , --- %
<br /> detached garage in a similar location. The ,:-, I- "?"'a,; ' oo , ' i
<br /> attached garage addition will be located within o. , - - .'li +
<br /> the 75-foot setback.There will also be an ` "" °..- .. \ i �fo°'Setback1 \ ti
<br /> addition of a front porch which requires a rear
<br /> yard setback variance. In order to construct the Figure 1
<br /> new home,the applicant is requesting variances
<br /> from lot area, average lakeshore setback,75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot
<br /> lakeshore setback, and rear yard setback. The project is proposing to decrease the overall hardcover and
<br /> bring the property into conformance.
<br />
|