My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
04-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2023 9:16:11 AM
Creation date
4/18/2023 8:25:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#LA23-000017 <br /> April 17,2023 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> to remain.The property also currently has a parking pad where the new garage is to be located.The <br /> current width of the driveways on the property are similar to what is being proposed. The applicant is <br /> required to obtain County approval for the proposed curb cut as Tonkawa Road is a County road. <br /> Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) <br /> The existing property is over the maximum hardcover of 25% per the Stormwater Overlay District.The <br /> current property is approximately 35% hardcover.The proposed project will remove portions of the <br /> existing driveway and the existing garage. The project will reduce the property's overall hardcover to 32%, <br /> bringing it closer to conformance. <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br /> variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br /> light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br /> area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br /> provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties <br /> because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend <br /> approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical <br /> difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, <br /> subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any <br /> use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a <br /> two-family dwelling. <br /> According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The variances <br /> for the construction of a new accessory building and driveway are supported by practical <br /> difficulties.The lot has significant topographical challenges that prevent the new garage to be <br /> placed further from the rear lot line.The proximity of the garage to the rear lot line also creates <br /> difficulties in adhering to driveway width requirements.The applicant is proposing to reduce <br /> the total hardcover on the site bringing it closer to conformance with the Ordinance.This <br /> criterion is met. <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The variances resulting in the <br /> construction of a new accessory building in a residential zone are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan.The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the <br /> land supporting their requests.The proposed project will also reduce the overall hardcover on <br /> the site which is consistent with the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan.This criterion is <br /> met. <br /> 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br /> a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br /> by the official controls;Constructing a new accessory building to be used as a detached <br /> garage is a reasonable use of the property.The current garage is nonconforming and is <br /> served by a steep driveway.The new property owners would like demolish the existing <br /> garage and construct a new garage closer to the street while reducing the overall <br /> hardcover on the site.The proximity of the garage to the rear property line and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.