Laserfiche WebLink
minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20,1997 <br />(#13 - #2305 Roger and Elizabeth Olsen « Continued) <br />Schroeder indicated he would have to review the plan. Berg said she would like to see • <br />what the impacts are. Schroeder suggested guidance be given to the applicant. Lindquist <br />asked that the hardcover calculations be improved. Berg noted that the Planning <br />Commission must review the application that wiU be seen by the Council. <br />Olsen said the shift would change the front setback from 35' to 32’ and asked if that was a <br />big consideration. He was informed that Lindquist that it was a consideration. <br />Schroeder questioned the need for 4 garage stalls. <br />Lindquist informed the applicant that the City does not like to sec any structure within die <br />75' lakeshore setback. <br />^ • <br />• <br />Mrs. Olsen suggested the plan eliminate the 10' within the setback that is in question by <br />the covenants. Olsen said he could eliminate 10' from the plan but would lose storage <br />space. Lindquist suggested the architectural design be considered as well. <br />Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2305. <br />Dr. Bill Cottlcman, a next-door neighbor, was present representing the homeowners' <br />association. He submitted a letter form the architectural committee regarding their <br />restrictive covenants. He noted their restrictions are more stringent than those of the City. <br />He said the homeowners' association would approve the home being more centered on the <br />lot. A copy of the letter was submitted to staff. He said the association prefers to see as <br />much distance between the homes as possible. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#14j1#H0^^LEN PETERSON, HAVING AN HSTEREST IN 3355 CRYSTAL <br />BAY R0AD>V4RI^CES - PUBLIC HEADING 11:05-11:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publicatioh-aQd Certifl^ateof Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Photos were showm of the pr^erty. <br />Bressler reported that tfie applicant is proposing constructionhf^82’s.f. carport with a <br />deck above it attached to the front of the existing residence. Thel2*'^We carport would <br />extend 22 out over the existing driveway with a walkway. This proposafl^^ill require <br />variances fohside setback, lakeshore setback, and 0-75' and 75-250’ setbacki^dcover.