My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:07:39 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:04:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 <br />(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED <br />unhealthy trees. <br />St: idard remarked that the Planning Commission hdS to act on what Is before it tonight, noting <br />that the Planning Commission is merely a recommending bc<iy and that any plans would need to <br />be approved by the City Council. Stoddard commented that the Applicant should work with City <br />Staff on the reforestation, noting that he would like to see some mature trees planted to screen <br />the neighbors' view as well as the proposed hardcover reduced. <br />Luzaich stated they had proposed the retaining walls in an effort to save the hill. <br />Weinberger commented that the stumps could possibly be removed but that the roots should <br />remain to help hold the dirt in place with new plants and trees planted. <br />Reznick Inquired whether anything could be agreed to tonight. <br />Eric Paulson, Old Beach Road, stated that he has lived in this area for the past 21 years and <br />belongs to the Lafayette Bay Association which has been proactive In trying to preserve the natural <br />beauty of Lafayette Bay. Paulson remarked that the property owners were perhaps ignorant of the <br />laws regarding removal of trees by the lakeshore. <br />Gaffron remarked that the City of Orono did not and would not issue a permit to allow this type of <br />tragedy to occur, noting that the City was not notified of this until a week after the work had already <br />been completed. Gaffron stated that the City of Orono Is adamant in its position that this type of <br />land alteration not occur near the lakeshore and that it is impossible to get back what has been <br />lost. <br />Weinberger stated that Wally Case is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester <br />who will review the Tile and look at the types of soils and determine what types of trees could be <br />planted. Weinberger stated that they would like to have this process started sometime this week. <br />Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant ’s landscape planner could meet with the forester. <br />Gary Mueller, Landscape Architect, stated he would be able to meet with the forester, noting that <br />they are willing to discuss this property and the recommendations that they have. Mueller <br />requested that the Planning Commission provide some guidance as to what they feel should be <br />provided for this area. <br />Hawn stated that retaining walls are not the answer. <br />Stoddard stated that ha>^ • over should be reduced and that he would like to see some larger trees <br />planted. <br />Lindquist remarked that the Comprehensive Plan is clear and that everything possible should be <br />done to restore what was lost. Lindquist stated that they should meet with the City's forester as <br />soon as possible to resolve this issue. Lindquist commented that this application will need to be <br />tabled since the proposal is not acceptable as presented tonight. <br />Berg commented that she is in agreement with the other members of the Planning Commission and <br />would like to see some larger trees planted in this area to help restore what was lost. <br />Luzaich inquired whether the stairway down to the lakeshore was okay. <br />Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.