My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:07:39 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:04:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />i <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />NDNUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 <br />#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED <br />Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law, was present. <br />Weinberger staled the Applicants are requesting variance and conditional use permit approvals for <br />lakeshore land afteration. including grading and construction of retaining walls within 75' of the <br />lakeshore and within a bluff impact zone; and further request an after-the-fact approval, Including <br />approval of a restoration plan, for intensive vegetative removal within 75 feet of the shoreline and <br />within a bluff impact zone. No restoration at this time has been completed. <br />Weinberger noted that the members of the Planning Commission have had an opportunity to <br />look at the property. Staff has concerns regarding the removal of the trees within 75 feet of the <br />shoreline due to possible erosion into the lake. <br />The Applicant is proposing to construct a four foot retaining wall to extend along the slope. Staff <br />has Issues regarding the proposed landscaping plan as it does not contain any provisions for <br />replacement of the trees that have been removed. Staff is requesting that reforestation be required <br />as part of this application. Wally Case. Landscape Architect, has had an opportunit> to review <br />the landscaping plan and is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester to determine <br />what trees would be best for this type of soil. <br />City Staff is recommending denial of the proposed landscape plan and requests that the Applicant <br />submit revised plans. Currently the stumps have not been removed. Staff would also like to have <br />the opportunity to review this application over time to Insure that proper restoration of this area is <br />achieved with similar trees. <br />Reznick inquired whether the City was requiring a replanting of mature trees approximately the <br />same size removed or if the Applicant could replace this type of trees writh a smaller size tree. <br />Weinberger stated that the City is requesting that the Applicant replace the trees with fairly mature <br />trees, noting that it is not possible to replace sorr.e of the larger trees. <br />Reznick expressed a concern regarding the cost of replacing the trees and suggested that the City <br />look at what is right for the property rather than punishing the property owners. Reznick noted that <br />the Applicant has been charged with a misdemeanor. The Applicants are veiling to cooperate with <br />the City to accomplish the restoration, but they would like to keep this property in line with the <br />other surrounding properties. <br />Reznick presented photographs to the Planning Commission and noted that the other properties <br />do not have the lake hidden from their view. Reznick requested that the Planning Commission <br />address the house plan, noting that the Applicants would like to start work on this property in the <br />near future. Reznick indicated that they would like to remove the stumps and replace wrth some <br />shrubbing, and expressed a concern that the equipment that would be needed to replace the <br />trees could cause the soil to be disturbed further. <br />Hawn indicated that she would like to see this property restored as quickly as possible to prevent <br />erosion. Hawn noted that the City has allowed rift-raft in cases where erosion has occun-ed, but <br />that the retaining walls are probably not going to be looked upon favorably by the Planning <br />Commission. Hawn stated that the Applicants will need to get together with the City foresters to <br />determine what is mosi feasible for this property. <br />Luzalch stated that he is fine with restoring the property, noting that he has spent money trimming <br />and pruning me other trees on his property and had merely removed what he thought was old <br />Pago 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.