Laserfiche WebLink
9-» * <br />Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 3 <br />September 8, 1999 <br />Public Works Land Expansion Options <br />B Secure vehicular access. <br />C. <br />D <br />E. <br />This option would provide an additional 2 acres of useable yard area that <br />would enable a brush site and a compost site. <br />Activities would be screened from adjacent properties. <br />There would be no cost for land acquisition. <br />Disadvantages: <br />I <br />B <br />This option would require the filling of wetlands. The wetland filling would <br />need to be mitigated by the creation of new wetlands on land owned by the <br />City. <br />This option would not provide land for future Public Works needs beyond the <br />brush site and compost site. <br />Use City-owned land adjacent to McCulley Road for a brush disposal site and leaf <br />compost site. <br />Advantages: <br />A. No land acquisition costs. <br />B. Provides sufficient land for a brush site and leaf compost site. <br />Disadvantages: <br />A. This site would be remote from the current Public Works facility, making it <br />less convenient and less efficient to use. <br />B It would be difficult to maintain the security of the property. The site would <br />have to be at least partially fenced and gated. The City would have to <br />provide a staff person to monitor the site whenever the gate was open. Even <br />with a fenced area, the site would likely experience unlawful dumping.