My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:34 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />(U9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH-FINAL PLAT <br />APPROVAL - Continued <br />Jabbour said at the time Spring Hill made its application, he had suggested that if Spring Hill <br />did not want to give the City the trail, he would vote for the application without the trail. <br />Now, there is a legal document between the City and Spring Hill and it is his fiduciary <br />responsibility to the City to see that the terms of the agreement are met. He said the original <br />idea was to use Spring Hill’s tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6. That idea has been abandoned so the <br />crossing must be on Co. Rd. 6. He suggested that representatives from the Council, City staff <br />and the golf course meet at the site and review the issues so that Spring Hill knows what <br />needs to be done. <br />Flint said he doesn’t think knowing what needs to be done is the issue. He believes Tim <br />Johnson knows exactly what needs to be done and that he could finish it in two weeks. He <br />said the difficult issue is building the trail in the County right-of-way. <br />Crosby said he understands that the County will not allow the trail to be built on their right-of- <br />way because of the dangerous crossing. <br />Gappa said he met with the County and they refused to discuss building the trail on their right- <br />of-way. <br />Flint said there are two ways to deal with that issue. One way is to build the trail on Spring <br />Hill’s property, but that leaves a segment with the question of how you get across the County <br />property. The oti.er way is to do it the long way, by getting the County to approve it. <br />Crosby said that Spring Hill could post a bond where the City has discretion to go forward if <br />it’s not done on an acceptable basis within a period of time. He agreed that there should be a <br />meeting with the golf course management where Crosby is present. He does not want to build <br />something that is unsightly or dangerous if there is a possibility of the County giving <br />permission to build the tr^ on its right-of-way. <br />Sansevere asked if Spring Hill could revisit using a part of the cart path to cross Co. Rd. 6. <br />Crosby said Spring Hill objects to using the tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6 because it is not <br />constructed for use in the winter and in the summer, it would ’./2 right in the middle of the golf <br />course. <br />Jabbour said it is too late to use the tunnel because the tunnel is already built and the size of <br />the tunnel does not lend itself to being divided for public and private use. <br />Crosby would like to arrange a meeting. He said that Spring Hill has announced to its <br />membership that they are going to open in late June. He would like to see if through bonding <br />or some other means they could preserve the opening date. He thinks most of the work can be <br />Page 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.