My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:34 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />(»9) U2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLA T <br />APPROVAL - Continued <br />Crosby said he would prefer to have a legal description for the trail as it presently exists. He <br />said he has provided language for the difficult portion of the trail south of the maintenance <br />shed and they would give the City ten feet north of the wetland. <br />Jabbour complimented Mr. Crosby on the project. He said there is really only one outstanding <br />issue and that is the trail. He said the trail is not finished and there are other issues with the <br />trail. He said that the area on the north side of Co. Rd. 6 is a very difficult area to build a trail, <br />but that is what was presented by the project manager. He said that the Council members went <br />on a tour of the trail and there is work that must be done to the trail. <br />Flint said then j are substantial problems with the trail and he is frustrated that nothing is <br />getting done. He itemized the following issues: <br />1. On the south end, there is supposed to be a gate to get to the trail that has not been <br />installed. <br />2. There is a point on the trail where it falls off to the side and it is very dangerous. It <br />needs to be built up on one side or cut down on the other side. <br />3. Up towards Co. Rd. 6, there was an agreement to move the fence over because it is <br />too close to a tree and that has not been done. <br />4. At the intersection of Co. Rd. 6 and 4, Spring Hill wanted the trail as close as possible <br />to the intersection. Tim Johnson had suggested building a terrace so that it would not <br />be necessary to build the trail at the top of the hill, but part way down. The terrace has <br />not been built and now Spring Hill’s position is that it ^1 be very expensive to build <br />the trail at that point and that it should be built on the County rigjit-of-way, but then <br />it’s the City’s problem to get the County’s approval. <br />5. Where the trail heads north on Tamarack, nothing has been completed. <br />6. The trail was supposed to be built to the south of wetland U12, which Tim Johnson <br />agreed to, and it has not been built. <br />Flint said he would prefer to stay with the old trail agreement until all the issues are resolved <br />and the trail is completed. He recommended that this matter be tabled for two weeks to try to <br />get the work done. The prior agreement was that the trail would be built and open at the same <br />time as the golf course. <br />Crosby asked if Tim Johnson was the individual that most of the discussions were with. <br />Flint said Johnson was at each of the field inspections. <br />Crosby said they are very conscious that the trail should open at the same time as the golf <br />course. He said the course is scheduled to open on June 25. He asked if the City wants the <br />area on 6th Avenue North built out. <br />Flint said yes. <br />Past 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.