My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:38:03 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r*"r <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage <br />10,430 s.f.Existing: 888.7 s.f. <br />Proposed: 1,444.02 s.f. <br />8.5% <br />13.8% <br />The deck located on the lakeside of the house is not surrounded by a fence, nor does it exceed 6' <br />above grade, therefore it is not considered structure. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Variance <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />The applicant has included his statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicant should also be <br />asked for his testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues <br />1.The existing lot does not contain a garage. The proposal would provide the applicants a 36' <br />by 24' attached two-car garage. <br />2. <br />3. <br />The proposal would meet all yard requirements. <br />Hardcover would increase to 51.14% in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Not included in the <br />setback is 517.25 s.f. of hardcover that would remain in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. Existing <br />on the property is 15.3% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. <br />4.A 5' by y storage shed that exists on the street property line would be removed should the <br />development be approved. <br />Should the City Council approve the application, staff recommends the applicant provide a drainage <br />plan that would be acceptable by City Staff to show the proposed development would not pose a risk <br />to the subject propert) or adjacent properties. This being completed prior to the issuance of a <br />building permit. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.