My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
01-25-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 2:20:47 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:31:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 11,1999 <br />(#6) #2425, SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERVICE 800, INC, 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - continued <br />Gafiron stated the plans canie in very late, but the applicant wanted to present the revised proposal. <br />He said the Council has the option to table the matter. <br />Moorse stated that the applicant wanted to get direction from the Council on whether the right- <br />in/right-out access is feasible. <br />Sansevere asked if moving the building is an option. <br />Bredeson stated there would be approximately $125,000 in redesign and other costs and she has a <br />June 1 deadline or she will lose a large contract. She stated the additional costs could make the <br />project infeasible. <br />Jabbour stated that all along the City, the owner of the property and the neighbor were planning the <br />access on the side of the building across from Brimhall. <br />Bredeson stated that all the plans proceeded on the assumption that Mn/DOT would approve their <br />original plan. <br />Peterson asked if Gaffton has had any conversations with Mn/DOT regarding the access. <br />Gafhon stated he spoke to Mn/DOT on January 8, but not prior to that time. Gaffiron stated that staff <br />had no knowledge of the existing easement on Otten’s property. <br />Jabbour polled the Council regarding the access. <br />Kelley stated he is in favor of the access across from Brimhall. <br />Peterson stated she is in favor of the temporary right-in/right-out with a stipulation that it be closed <br />if the rear frontage road is put in. <br />Flint stated he favors the access across from Brimhall, but he wants staff to contact Mn/DOT to see <br />if Mn/DOT would approve the original access proposed by the applicant. <br />Sansevere agreed with Flint that staff should contact Mn/DOT regarding the original plan. He favors <br />the right-in/right-out access if there is no other option. <br />Jabbour said he fa\ ors the original plan as submitted by the applicant. He does not feel it is realistic <br />to expect the frontage road will be put in. If a frontage road is going to be considered, all of the <br />neighbors must be notified. <br />Page? <br />1 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.