Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 11,1999 <br />(»6) U242S, SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERVICE 800, INC., 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - continued <br />Flint stated he would not be in favor of the developer paying for a left turn lane. <br />Kiemen stated he understands that to be Mn/DOT’s intention. <br />Moorse stated that neither Mn/DOT nor Orono would pay for the left turn lane. He believes the <br />right-in/right-out access will cause conflict and confusion. He stated that the frontage road would <br />provide access and that future development in the area will cause a hardship. <br />Bredeson stated that a left-hand turn would not be safe either and that people will not try to make <br />the left-hand turn when traffic is heavy. <br />Jabbour stated that the frontage road would have been a good solution, but that is not planned right <br />now. <br />Flint stated that he does not like the frontage road concept because it is not attractive to the residents <br />in that area. <br />Kelley stated that eventually Brown Road will have a stop light and an alternative would be to build <br />a dead-end frontage road that leads to Brown. <br />Flint stated that the residents in Sugar Woods would not like that. <br />Bredeson suggested that the right-in/right-out access be allowed until an alternate access is <br />developed. <br />Sansevere asked if staff had any recommendation. <br />Gaffton stated that an access from the rear would be good. The right-in/right-out access is not a good <br />option and neither is the left turn. <br />Sansevere asked if the landscape plan changes with the right-in/right-out access. <br />Gaffron stated the landscape plan would have to change. <br />Kiemen stated the quantity of trees would stay the same, but the configuration would change. <br />Jabbour stated he wants more detail and does not want to design the project at a Council meeting. <br />Page 6