My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
11-15-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 12:20:40 PM
Creation date
4/5/2023 12:14:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1687 <br />October 156, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />It should also be noted that if Planning Commission members <br />approve staff proposal that an additional 120 s.f. of drive will <br />result by moving garage 5' north. Hardcover proposed with <br />staff's recommendation would be at 5,336.7 s.f. or 63.7%. <br />The following is a list of existing or proposed <br />improvements, the area of each and the hardcover percentage: <br />0-75' setback area <br />Gravel drive = 392 s.f. or 4.4% <br />75-250' setback area <br />Portion of deck constructed without building <br />permit = 192 s.f. or 2.29% <br />Existing garage and storage building = 319.5 s.f. <br />or 3.8% <br />Proposed storage/workshop addition *= 258 s.f. or <br />3.07% <br />Staff would ask Plannnig Commission members who are able to <br />visit the sight to review the gravel area. Do members feel <br />additional gravel area can be removed now that turnaround is <br />provided in the rear yard? Should the 392 s.f. of gravel area be <br />removed in the 0-75' setback area....will it create exiting <br />problems? <br />Hardship Statement <br />Review both application form and applicant's addendum. <br />Exhibits A and B. Applicant notes the shape, size and unique <br />location of property. In addition the addendum notes the need <br />for a garage to house the family cars during both the extreme <br />cold winter months and summer months. Staff would also add the <br />hardship that over 50% of the area of this property is located in <br />the 0-75' setback area. The property was also developed long <br />before the current lakeshore development standards established in <br />1975. <br />Additional Staff Comments <br />Any recommendation of approval must include either removals <br />of existing hardcover or reduction in proposed improvements to be <br />consistent with previous actions of the City in granting <br />hardcover variances. <br />Isv <br />L....
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.