Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26.1998 <br />(#2430 Paul Phillips, Continued) <br />Goetten inove37Tetcr$on.,4cconded, tosctyLAppHcff(ToirW430,2140 Sixth Avenue <br />North, hark fn th» Pi<tnnhi^l05nyTfffs5|^^]fot^heir^ VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />^ *(#13) #2431 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4185 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2431,815 Partenwood Road, <br />and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4185. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />[H) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 4755/4775 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />EA^MENT/SUBDIVISION <br />Laurie Lur\deen, Greenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg, were present. <br />Van Zomeren sba(ed the Applicants are requesting a revision or amendmOTt to the final plat <br />resolution to accommodate a private driveway easement over Lot 3 to^ovide access to <br />Lot 1, The private dnyeway easement does not comply with the ap^val resolution for the <br />final plat, which shows ahsoutlot for all three lots along Bayside R^d. Van Zomeren stated <br />Staff is generally not in favoKof private driveway easements dueJfo the possible problems that <br />may result. <br />The Planning Commission recommend^ denial of a priva^easement and suggested that the <br />Applicant apply for a lot line rearrangembqt, which woi^ require a lot width variance for <br />Lot 3. <br />Jim DeBerg, 1551 Hunter Lane, Medina, stated hi^had previously met with the property <br />owner and offered the private driveway casern^ nolVMlizing that it was in conflict with <br />what was originally approved in the Resolution. DeBerg^ted he was later informed by the <br />building official that he could not have a pwate driveway Msment. <br />Laurie Lundeen stated they were unaw^e they could not grant a private driveway easement. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the City doe^oi officially recognize a private drivbway easement. <br />DeBerg remarked that even witlythe granting of the private driveway easemenCtlje lot still <br />exceeds the minimum lot size. <br />Van Zomeren stated a lot^dth variance would be needed in the case of a lot line <br />rearrangement for the middle lot.