10-18-1999 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • • •* ff , „ * regulations must be narrowly wafted to address adverse secondarv ecte. th^ must be reasonably related to reduwion of these effects and thev mu«V capable of objective application. If these standards can be met. licensino «W^ry provisions may play an important role in preventing uiiwanted LposJe to • • It Is dear that feflure to act upon a license application for a sexuallv orienferf gratlirifc^ ^ ^ regulauon. Without justilication. denial or l^ure to g Is a poor restraint in violation of the First Amendment Parltwav y,... a,« «. 7„787, * « • . • the ^eSTTSSS *^f "^Xon pictore toeator'lf unconstitutional as a prior restraint of free speech Alexander v citv 5rf c# d^.i N.W^d 370 (Minn. 1975). The Alexander cou^: ^ «rT ~ ^ Cohen v. CItv nf nai«<gi. eas F. Supp. lies, (1^ sa>« o'obscene material cannot Justiiy revocalidn of 0 ori Jrr"' communities to deny lioenses to sexuallv “-oted Of tier closely related to the operation of sexually oriented hi«in«j,9, ^ ®ourt reviewed a requirement that a license the enumerated crimes were held to be not sufficiently related to the purpose of the -42-