My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
regulation is not designed to suppress the content of expressive activity and is <br />sufficiently tailored to accomplish the regulatory purpose. <br />The Working Group believes that communities have more prosecutorial and <br />regulatory opportunities than they may currently recognize. The purpose of this section <br />of the Report is to identify and recommend enforcement and regulatory opportunities. <br />Of course, each community must decide on its own how to balance its limited <br />resources and the wide variety of competing demands for such resources. <br />I. OBSCENITY PROSECUTION <br />Obscene material Is not protected by the Rrst Amendment Miller v. CaUfomia. <br />413 U.S. 15, 93 S. Ct 2607 (1973). The sale or distribution of obscene material in <br />Minnesota is a criminal offense. The penalty was recerrtiy Increased to up to one year <br />in jail and a $3,000 fine for a first offense, and up to two years in jail and a $10,000 fine <br />for a second or subsequent offense within five years. Minn. Stat § 617.241, subd. 3 <br />(1988).^ <br />• • • <br />The Working Group believes that Minnesota ’s obscenity statutes are adequate to <br />prosecute and penalize the sale and distribution of obscene materials. However, <br />historically, widespread obscenity prosecution has not occurred. <br />The Working Group believes this is not because the sale or distribution of obscene <br />publications In Minnesota is rare, but because prosecutors have been reluctant to bring <br />obscenity charges, because of limited resources, difficulties faced when prosecuting <br />obscenity, and because obscenity has historically been considered a victimless crime. <br />4/ The prior penalty was a fine only - up to $10,000 for a first offense and up to <br />$20,000 for a second or subsequent offense. Minn. Stat { 617.241. subd. 3 (19^. <br />Obscenity arrests are so infrequent that incidents invofwkj possible violatfons of <br />section 617.241 are not separately compiled by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal <br />Comprehension. See Bureau of Criminal Aporehension. 1967 Minnesota Annual <br />Report on Crime. Missino Children and Bureau or cnminai Aoorenension Activities. <br />•21-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.