Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> February 27,2023 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Edwards said it could be a standing Council agenda item,which would be setting the draft agenda, so to <br /> speak for the upcoming work session or confirming it. He said for the next work session right now he has <br /> nothing on that agenda. So you would say okay, we're going to cancel it. I think the only people that can <br /> cancel it are the Council. <br /> Benson said just to be clear it's not that I directed Adam,because we already had that discussion. We all <br /> were in agreement that no one person directs Adam or staff to change anything. So when the work session <br /> was changed from 5 p.m.to 5:30 p.m. and I asked you,why is that and you said Mayor Walsh said it to <br /> be so and I'm thinking well,that's something that the Council should discuss. It should not come from <br /> either me, Councilmember Johnson. <br /> Walsh said I like Matt's idea that we just cancel all work sessions.And we put it either on the Council <br /> itself, if we don't want to have it at the work session, or we have to approve any work session,the time <br /> and the agenda at the Council to begin with. <br /> Seals said for example, are we saying there'll be a standing item that would say next meetings work <br /> session, and then if there was anything and then maybe we'd look at it and be like, okay,that's 30 minutes, <br /> that's an hour,whatever that might be. The benefit of that, I guess, is this community gets a heads up <br /> what's coming two weeks out. And control that we cancel all work sessions and we have to approve any <br /> work session and the agenda at the previous meeting. <br /> Benson said I'm not in favor of this. And I'll tell you why. It's because there's been accusations from <br /> people showing up at these meetings, saying when are you deliberating when you make a decision? So I <br /> do think that this discussion would be a great one to have in the next work session about work sessions. <br /> Let's figure it out at a work session, because that's what work sessions are for is doing the business of the <br /> City. I'm not in favor of this.And I don't think we should be taking a vote on this, if that's where this is <br /> headed. I am not in any way approving of this. This was not on the agenda. This is done after our closed <br /> session. And while we've reopened the meeting, I am not in favor of this. <br /> Mattick said if I could just weigh in on it a little bit,this is a regularly-scheduled meeting. So you can add <br /> items to be discussed. The way it traditionally works is you, at the beginning of the year,you post your <br /> regularly-scheduled meetings like tonight's meeting, and you have the flexibility then at a regular meeting <br /> to either add to the agenda,take off the agenda, do those sorts of things. If you cancel all of your work <br /> sessions,those are still a meeting subject to the Open Meeting Law.And so if I understand what's being <br /> proposed is like,tonight, we'd have an agenda item, next work session,that then becomes a special <br /> meeting because you have no scheduled work sessions. So at that point,the one drawback is that you are <br /> limited to whatever that agenda is posted as --you cannot add other items. And maybe that's not a <br /> drawback, but that is something I'd like you to be aware of. <br /> Seals asked could you leave the work sessions on the calendar?And then at the meeting prior to the next <br /> one,you discuss the work session topic, so they're all scheduled. So instead of adding the canceled one <br /> back in,you would have a discussion two weeks prior saying we have this work session scheduled. <br /> Adam,what are the topics?And if Adam says there's nothing and we say there's nothing then you could <br /> cancel. <br /> Page 21 of 22 <br />