My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-19-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
07-19-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:57:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• V ORONO PLANNING COAMSSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 <br />#2469 PETER ANDREA COMPANY, CONTINUED <br />655 Stubbs Bay Road North, to the June 21st meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />* * •. . ’v *‘ * .•* * ■ * • • • * <br />Havm Inquired v/helher there were any niembers present In the audience v;h6 had wanted to speak <br />‘regarding this application. <br />Sbc to eight people Indicated that they were here tonight regarding this application. <br />Hawn commented that this application should be removed from tabling to allow the people In <br />the audience to comment on this application. Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant can be <br />contacted to see If he would be attending tonight’s meeting. <br />Weinberger stated he attempted to contact the Applicant prior to the meeting butvras unable <br />to reach him. Weinberger remarked that the Applicant was to have contacted him to tell him of his • <br />. plans for tonight. The Applicant indicated that he does intend to submit revised plans. <br />• • <br />A resident In the audience commented that this was the second time that the Applicant has not <br />appeared. <br />Lindquist stated that the Planning Commission does not have much choice but to table this <br />application. Lindquist inquired whether the residents v/ould be notified of the next hearing. <br />Weinberger stated that the neighbors are required to receive notice of the hearings. <br />Lindquist comrhented that the Planning Commission has no assurance that the Applicant will , <br />appear at the next hearing either, but that they will be required to reappear at the next hearing if <br />they wish to speak to this application. <br />Hawn stated that the Applicant Is proposing to revise his plans, which hopefully will alleviate some <br />of the concerns that the neighbors may have. <br />Lindquist commented that he v/ould like to see the neighbors Involved somewhat In the planning of <br />this subdivision, noting that there are issues regarding access onto Stubbs Bay Road and how that <br />will impact the properties on the other side of the road. <br />Hawn requested that the people who are in attendance leave their name with Mr. Weinberger. <br />Weinberger stated that it is the Intent to develop the street into a cul-de-sac temporarily and it is the <br />City's position that 27 feet be dedicated in the event that a road to the north Is needed to serve those <br />• lots. Weinberger noted that a portion of the property will be dedicated to MnDot at the time the new <br />■interchange is put in. Weinberger stated that City Staff is aware that one property will become <br />landlocked once the new Highway 12 improvements are completed. <br />Hav/n requested that her motion be reinstated to table this matter. <br />NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED <br />(#5) #2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON, 940 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT, 7:15 p.m. - 7:22 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Page 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.