My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:22:56 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999(Comprehensive Plan, continued)degree correction to what currently exists and not to do a major revision of the comprehensive plan.Schroeder stated that this would be a great oppotunity for the members of the Planning Commission to become familiar with the comprehensive plan. <br />Gaffron stated that the City Council would like to have the Planning Commission involved Iri th'^ <br />process and would like the Planning Commission to follow the recommendations contained in the <br />comprehensive plan as much as possible. <br />Richard Flint, City Council Representative, stated that it is the desire of the City Council to have the <br />Planning Commission participate in the revision and invited the Planning Commission members to <br />attend their Thursday morning workshop meetings to discuss this issue. <br />Hawn expressed some frustration over the fact that the Planning Commission has been consulted <br />in the past on previous zoning code revisions and no final vote has ever been taken by the City <br />Council on the finished product and they have not been given any insight on whether their Input has <br />been useful or not. <br />Flint stated that the City Council has heard similar concerns by the Park Commission that their <br />input is not really heard. <br />Hawn commented that the home occupation ordinance is one example where the Plannii^ <br />Commission reviewed the information and gave their input but nothing definite was ever done <br />regarding the ordinance. <br />Berg commented that she would like to see resolution of some of these issues and will continue to <br />review any upcoming issues in the interests of the community. <br />Schroeder stated that he understands that the Planning Commission acts as a recommending b^y <br />to the City Council, but that the members of the Planning Commission really need to be Informed as <br />to what is contained in the comprehensive plan so they are able to act with authority on the <br />applications. <br />Lindquist commented he would like some feedback on the input by the Planning Commission as well. <br />Stoddard stated that in his view the Planning Commission should be involved in this process and <br />commented he was In agreement with a subcommittee being formed to review this issue. <br />Hawn remarked that it Is the goal of the Planning Commission to be as effective and useful as <br />possible to the City. <br />Flint Indicated that the City Council does not rule with a single voice and that the members of the <br />City Council do look at whether these applications have been passed by a unanimous vote or not <br />and the various concerns raised by the Planning Commission when a vote is taken on them. <br />Lindquist stated that he would be willing to attend the Thursday morning workshops If this item <br />is scheduled to be discussed. <br />Schroeder stated he would like the City Council to consider a subcommittee for this item. <br />Page 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.