My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:22:56 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:May 10,1999 <br />SUBJECT: #2494 Dan Andersen <br />2885 Little Orchard Way <br />Variance-Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />RR-IB <br />2.0 acres <br />One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) <br />Application: The applicant has requested a variance for an undeveloped lot within the <br />recently approved Little Orchard Addition. When the subdivision was approved a stable remained <br />on the lot located near the front yard setback line and encroaching into the required 30' side yard <br />setback. It was the subdivider's intent the building be removed, however the applicant has requested <br />the stable be moved to a conforming location on the lot. The building would be moved away from <br />Little Orchard Way to the rear of the lot meeting all required yard setbacks. <br />Setbacks were applied as regulated in the Zoning Code, 30' for side yards and 50' for tront and rear <br />yards. Because the lot is located at the end of a cul-de-sac the lot has five sides. The front yard was <br />determined to be that portion of the lot adjacent to the cul-de-sac (Little Orchard Way). The side <br />yards are the south and eastern lot lipes, and the lot has two identified rear lot lines. The applicant <br />has requested the City allow the west property line to be identified as a side lot line to allow a 30’ <br />setback rather than 50' as required for rear yards. <br />This application requires the following approvals: <br />1. <br />2. <br />Variance from Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) Accessory Buildings: States accessory <br />buildings are not allowed to exist on a lot without a principal building. The property ovsners <br />will move the existing stable to the rear of the lot from its non-conforming location. <br />Establishing a 30' side yard setback for the west property line. The Little Orchard Addition <br />defined this property line as a rear lot line requiring a 50' setback. <br />U2494 Dan Anders*n <br />2385 Little Orchard IVay <br />Var lance <br />5/17/99 <br />Page I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.