Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Amendment: LR-lC-1 Density Credit <br />February 10, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />1* <br />Impact of the 50% Density' Credit <br />The LR-lC-1 density credit simply allows "a 50% increase in dwelling unit density over the LR-IC <br />District". The LR-IC District requires a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, which translates to a <br />maximum dwelling unit density of 2 units per acre. A 50% increase in density yields 3 units per <br />acre. This credit is the sole basis for the LR-lC-1 District. <br />Opportunities for Housing Variety Along Highway 12 <br />The number of multi-family dwelling units that might be developed or redeveloped in the existing <br />LR-lC-1 zones under the current code (excluding the Tonka Ventures property which will provide <br />29 townhouse units) is likely less than 20. However, the City has provided for significant numbers <br />of multi-family dwelling units in its Highway 12 Corridor along the north side of Highway 12 <br />between Willow Drive and Old Cr> stal Bay Road. The 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. <br />2 contemplates (and provides for) from 50 to perhaps 250 units of townliomes being developed at <br />densities up to 6-8 units per acre. This area of Orono does not suffer from the existing high-density <br />problems of traffic, stormwater management, etc. that are found in Navarre. Development at higher <br />densities in the Highway 12 corridor can be accomplished in a manner that addresses all related <br />concerns, rather than adding to them as it would in Navarre. <br />Retain LR-lC-1 PRD Attached-Unit Capability? <br />An alternative to total elimination of the LR-lC-1 district is to retain the ability to use a PRD to <br />enable clustering and attached units. That is, allow up to 4 attached units via a PRD, at the <br />underlying district density. This would retain the ability to have a variety of housing (single family, <br />twinhomes, quads) under "conditions" (A thru H). <br />Summary <br />Elimination of the 50% credit without retaining the ability for attached units, would functionally <br />remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-IC and LR-lC-1 Districts. In this case, <br />it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-lC-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone <br />all LR-lC-1 properties to LR-IC. <br />Retention of the ability in LR-lC-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and <br />the preservation of trees and green space that is not possible in the LR-IC zone. <br />To this end, staff has drafted 2 options for amending the LR-lC-1 District for discussion and <br />recommendation (Exhibits A).