My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
02-16-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:47:16 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:43:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 <br />f«2> #2449 JOHN VOQT/MIKE HILBEUNK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN <br />ROAD - ConOnu0d <br />Van Zomeren said that the primary issue for staff is the access to the back two lots. This is also an <br />issue to the neighbors. She said that staff recommends that a 50 ’ outlot be platted across the <br />northern end of the parcel and that the temporary cul-de-sac in Crystal Creek be eliminated and a <br />new temporary cul-de-sac be created to serve the proposed two new lots, Lot 7 in Crystal Creek, and <br />the outlot owned by Kingsbridge Properties. <br />Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present. They stated they did not receive their copies of the staff <br />report until today. Hilbelink stated they are not proposing to extend the cul-de-sac for access. They <br />would prefer a private drive. He stated there is room to make sure there are three acres in both of <br />the rear lots. He said they have no desire to connect Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane. He stated <br />that most or all of the accessory buildings will be removed. Hilbelink stated he has talked to Mr. <br />Stubbs and there is a possibility of one or two buiktable tots on his property. Extension of Wear Lane <br />to Crystal Creek would destroy that possibility. <br />Chair Smith noted that three letters were received regarding the proposal: <br />Steven & Anne Kahler, 35 Crystal Creek Road, dated January 15,1999 <br />Michael & Gayle Sievert, 85 Wear Ln. N., dated January 18,1999 <br />Richard & Joan Scorza, 2850 Wear Circle, dated January 20,1999 <br />John Winston, 155 Wear Lane, stated he is concerned about the linkage of Wear Lane to Crystal <br />Creek Road and he does not want to see that happen. He said that he and his neighbors do not <br />object to the subdivision, they are not in favor of linking Wear Lane to Crystal Creek Road. <br />Hugh Hoffman, 40 Wear Lane North, stated that he agrees with Mr. Winston. <br />Steve Alseth, 3385 Watertown Road, questioned the number of lots. <br />Van Zomeren clarified that this would be a three-lot subdivision. <br />Rick Carlson, Jyland Development, stated he has purchased an option on the remaining lots in <br />Crystal Creek. He supports access through Crystal Creek, but he is not in favor of a through-road to <br />Wear Lane and he does not support a public road. He said that Outlot B is now considered <br />unbuildabie. He opposes the 50 ’ easement on the north to provide access creating a flag lot. He is <br />also concerned about the cost for the private road. There has not been any discussion regarding <br />these new lots contributing to the cost of Crystal Creek Road. <br />Smith asked for Rick Carlson’s opinion on connecting Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane. <br />Carlson said he feels two more lots on the private road would not be a problem because Crystal <br />Creek Road was constructed to public road standards. He said there would be no gain to Orono in <br />making it a public road. <br />Mark Supalla, 160 Wear Lane, complimented John Vogt on the project and said that he supports the <br />subdivision. <br />Alan Carlson stated that he developed the area of Crystal Creek. He said that he has no objection to <br />the subdivision provided the applicants give up the easement over the north lot to Outlot B. He said <br />that vriien he developed Crystal Creek, the easement was for access to four lots that he has already <br />had approved. The cul-de-sac was supposed to be temporary until the road was extended to Outlot <br />B. He wants a road developed that would provide access to his lots. <br />Pages
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.