My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
02-16-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:47:16 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:43:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 <br />(1t4) M2443 QLEN UPTON. 3688 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - Continued <br />SmHh said she cannot support anything over what the code will allow. <br />Upton asked if he should Just construct a platform. <br />Smith said yes. <br />Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, a motion to deny #2443 for Glenn Upton, 3M6 North <br />Shore Drive, based on the new deck being located within the 0-76’ lakeshore setback and the <br />hardship on the property was created by the applicant constructing the deck without <br />obtaining permits. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#2) #2449 JOHN VOOT/MIKE HILBEUNK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN <br />ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT, 7:01 p.m. - 8:40 p.m. <br />Van Zomeren stated this is an application for a three-lot preliminary plat. The site is approximately <br />12 acres in size with approximately 10.1 dry acres. Staff notified all the property owners in the <br />Crystal Creek Homeowners Association that this item would be on the agenda. The applicants are <br />proposing to subdivide the parcel into three lots and two outlots. Lot 3 would contain the existing <br />residence and accessory structures. Access for Lot 3 would continue to be provided off of Watertown <br />Road. The two new lots, Lot 1 and Lot 2, would be served by Outlet B which would be next to the <br />private road in the Crystal Creek subdivision. If the two new lots are considered to be back lots, they <br />would be required to have 3 acres of dry land. Lot 2 is 2.9 acres and Lot 1 is 3.3 acres. Along with <br />this proposal, Outlet A is being created which could potentially be for sate to an adjacent property <br />owner. Outlet A would be 1 acre in size. Outlet B. which would provide access, is .21 acres. <br />Wherever an outlot is platted rather than a private road, the lots that are served via the outlet are <br />considered to be back lots. The back lot Issue is a concern since one of the lots Is proposed to be <br />less than 3 acres. With back lots, there are increased setbacks for front, rear and side yards at 150% <br />of the requirement for the district. It appears that the proposed home locations could probably meet <br />that requirement. There are five accessory structures on Lot 3. If the structural lot coverage exceeds <br />3,200 square feet, either one of the buildings needs to be removed to meet the requirement or a <br />variance will be needed. One of the buildings may have historical significance. Steve Weekman has <br />evaluated the proposed septic locations. He notes that there are two stormwater ponds in the Crystal <br />Creek subdivision and his concern was that the proposed septic site for Lot 3 is located only 58 feet <br />from one of the ponds where 75 feet is required. A variance for the location of the drainfield will be <br />required. She stated that the Park Dedication Fee needs to be determined. The Hennepin County <br />Assessor has been asked to review the proposal and determine the fair market value of the <br />undeveloped land. <br />Van Zomeren stated that there are several engineering issues. The private driveway off of the <br />private road is an issue because the City does not typically approve subdivisions that have streets <br />that are longer than 1,000 feet or serving more than 10 units. This proposal would increase the <br />length of the private road and the number of units served. The subdivision ordinance states that cul- <br />de-sacs shall be discouraged. It was anticipated that Crystal Creek Road would eventually be <br />connected to Wear Lane; however. Wear Lane is a public road and Crystal Creek Road is a private <br />road. She pointed out that one of the adjacent properties is owned by Stubbs Bay Moving Co. Since <br />there is a lot of equipment located on the property, the soils are probably compacted and there may <br />not be a suitable se^ic site on that property. The future of that property for residential development <br />is limited without sewer. <br />Van Zomeren said that the City Engineer has noted that a street in Outlot B would drain to the storm <br />sewer and pond in the Crystal Creek subdivision, that more ponding capacity could be required and <br />that the Watershed District would need to comment. There are also grading and drainage issues. <br />Page 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.