My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
04-17-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:56:26 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:46:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 <br />(IH2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) <br />Hawn stated the Applicant needs to address the drainage concerns and reduce structural coverage. <br />Hawn indicated she does not have a problem with an attached garage. <br />Kluth commented the driveway is not a major issue in his opinion. <br />Hawn remarked the Applicant may have some issues with snow removal as well. <br />Anderson commented the road was not constructed as It was originally platted and should be located <br />further uphill. <br />Weinberger stated the City Engineer can review the drainage and grading plans prepared by the <br />Applicant's engineer and make whatever recommendations are necessary. Weinberger noted the <br />City Engineer normally does not go out and review the site. <br />Gaffron pointed out it would be hard to tell the viability of the tree at this time of year, and suggested <br />the Applicant hire a tree service to look at the tree and make some recommendations on what <br />should be done. <br />Hawn suggested the application be tabled. <br />Anderson requested the matter be tabled. <br />Hawn moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2486, Elaine Erickson, 1270 Spruce <br />Place, to allow the Applicant time to revise their plans, submit a grading and drainage <br />plan, and to address the issues with the damaged tree. <br />Gaffron Inquired whether the Applicant will be allowed to keep the structural coverage at the <br />proposed 16 percent. <br />Hawn stated the Planning Commission typically does not allow structural coverage to exceed the <br />allowable 15 percent. Hawn stated it is hard to determine the exact amount of hardcover being <br />proposed at this time, which will need to be recalculated. <br />Gaffron suggested the Applica.nt iuwcr the deck below six feet so it will not be counted as <br />structural coverage. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />9 GILBERT GEHLE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES, 8:28 p.m. -9:15 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Maittng^d Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Gilbert Gehle, Applicant, was presen <br />Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting hardcdvec-xariances to permit hardcover in excess <br />of 25 percent within the 75-250’ lakeshore setback and to permirhaojcwer within 75’ of the south <br />iakeshore. A variance is also required to permit a small amount of regr8dkia within the south <br />0-75’ lakeshore setback for a driveway. <br />Page 10 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.