Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 <br />(#2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) <br />to correct the drainage. Hawn noted the Planning Commission typically does not approve walkouts <br />near the lakeshore. Hawn acknowledged the tree in the location of the bulge has been <br />damaged, which should also be addressed. <br />Hawn noted the Planning Commission typically does not permit structural coverage to exceed the <br />allowable 15 percent. Hawn stated the deck would be considered hardcover versus structural <br />coverage if the proposed residence was a two-story structure. <br />Kluth stated he would like to separate what appear to be aesthetic concerns versus hardships that <br />exist due to the topography of the land. Kluth commented he Is in agreement with Hawn and that <br />some action should be taken to correct the incorrect drainage that has occurred as a result of the <br />grading on the adjoining property. Kluth stated he would like City Staff to continue working with the <br />Applicants to see if some resolution could be reached to these issues. <br />Anderson stated a walkout could still be created without the bulge being removed. Anderson stated <br />they are in agreement that something needs to be done with the damaged tree. <br />Hawn inquired whether additional fill could be put near the tree. <br />Anderson stated if additional fill were placed in that area, it would block the neighbor's view of the <br />lake, which was one reason why the grading was completed. Anderson stated the house could <br />perhaps be moved further back out of Ine 0-75' setback, and suggested that the grade between her <br />mother's house and her house be altered to help correct the drainage in that area. <br />Hawn inquired whether that would eliminate the need for a retaining wall. <br />Anderson stated it would. <br />Hawn stated the Planning Commission needs some direction from an engineer as it relates to the <br />excavation and the impact to drainage that any grading work would do to this property as well as <br />the adjoining properties. <br />Kluth commented he has concerns regarding the grading and drainage. Kluth suggested the parties <br />speak to City Staff regarding the removal of the damaged tree. <br />Hawn stated the City ’s forester should perhaps take a look at the situation before the tree is <br />removed. Hawn stated she would not be opposed to a small amount of grading on this property, <br />but noted the overall grading and drainage issues need to be further addressed before any approval <br />can be given. <br />Anderson staled they are merely requesting the right to level the land In this area. <br />Hawn reiterated that an engineer will need to review the situation and submit his recommendations <br />to City Staff. <br />Weinberger stated the City Engineer can review this situation and how it will affect the lakeshore. <br />Weinberger commented the City wants to protect the natural environment as much as possible. <br />Nygard acknowledged there appears to be a major drainage issue which needs to be addressed <br />Hawn stated the Applicant will need to show how much grading will occur, where the grading will <br />occur, and how much dirt will be moved. <br />Page 9