My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
03-20-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:51:26 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:45:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />r <br />Other issues for discussion ns raised with previous applications <br />1. <br />2. <br />City agreeded to vacate west half of Navarre Lane in prior application. <br />The southerly access is the same as approved for the prior bank/office/retail proposal and is <br />located consistent with the Walgreen's proposal. The City of Orono shall reserve the right, <br />with Hennepin County, to limit access for the southerly entrance/exit to a right in/out should <br />traffic levels increase to create a public safety concern. Driveways and curb cuts for business <br />uses are regulated by Section 6.05 of the municipal code. The proposed access plan appears <br />to meet the standards of that section, with the exception that only one driveway access is <br />normally allowed for a business s>te. This proposal has two. The second access was <br />discussed at length during the prior proposals, and ultimately was approved for the <br />bank/office/retail plan. The circuiaiion pattern for the current plan is quite similar to the <br />earlier plans (bauk/office/retail and Walgreen ’s), counterclock>^se around the building to <br />accommodate the drive-thru. The second access is expected to provide a safer exit for <br />delivery trucks leaving the site than would be by a single access to the property. ^ <br />3.This proposed access connection is similar to that approvea for the bank/office/retail plan <br />in 1998. The plan would circulate similar to the access that exists. The applicant has <br />mentioned they are communicating about cross parking easements with the Culver’s <br />property. <br />4.Legal combination of the four tax parcels should be a condition of approval. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />1.Planning Commission should make recommendations to the applicant regarding the <br />following variances; <br />Front Yard Setback for Parking: Section 10.44, Subdivision 6 to permit a front yard <br />setback for a parking lot to encroach 5'. The proposed parking area is IS' from the <br />property line where the Code requires 20'. <br />Hardcover: Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit 27,165 s.f. (73.7%) <br />hardcover in the North 500-1000' shoreland setback where 12,896 s.f. (35%) is <br />allowed, £uid to permit 5,803 s.f. (62.8%) hardcover in the South 500-1000' shoreland <br />setback where 3,231 s.f. (35%) is allowed. <br />C)Required Parking Spaces: Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 to permit 96 parking spaces <br />on the cropeny where 105 spaces are required. <br />Drugstore lisc Required = 1 per i '0 s.f. of "net usable floor area for retail <br />use" (Net = 9,050 s.f.+ /150 = 60 stalk required) <br />nm WalfndProptrliti <br />2380 Shaiywoed Road <br />Commtreial Sit* Plan Rtvttv) <br />March 20. 2000 <br />pagt-7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.