My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
02-23-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 3:50:29 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:45:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />(#2556 Barbara and Collint Cavender, Continuad) <br />Boyer stated due to the narrowness of Rest Point Road and the lack of parking available <br />on the street, the house and garage need to be located further back to accommodate a <br />car in the driveway. <br />Stoddard commented he would be willing to approve a variance to the front yard setback, <br />but that the Applicants need to comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit. <br />Stoddard suggested this application be tabled to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. <br />Stoddard stated the Applicant probably will not be allowed to construct a patio or walkway <br />to the lake. <br />Mrs. Cavender stated the patio is located off to the side. <br />Nygard noted the patio is still located within the 0-75' setback. <br />Smith recommended the Applicants attempt to adhere to the 15 percent structural coverage <br />limit and relocate the house closer to the road. <br />Kluth indicated the number one issue is the structural coverage, with the 15 percent needing <br />to be complied with. Kluth stated he would like to see the hardcover under the 25 percent <br />limit as well due to environmental concerns. Kluth noted the 0-75 ’ setback is the most <br />critical as it relates to hardcover due to the impact to the lake. <br />Hawn stated it appears the Planning Commission would like the Applicants to adhere to the <br />15 percent structural coverage limit. Hawn inquired whether the Applicants would be willing <br />to extend the 60 day review period should the Planning Commission table this application. <br />Weinberger indicated City Staff will continue to work with the Applicants. <br />Stoddard commented the front yard setback should be compatible with the other houses in <br />the neighborhood, and suggested the Applicants consider locating the house 35 feet from <br />the lake. <br />Smith commented she would like to see the house 35 to 40 feet from the lake. <br />Stoddard inquired whether the Applicants would like the Planning Commission to table their <br />application. <br />Mr. Cavender requested their application be tabled. <br />Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2556, Barbara and Collins <br />Cavender, 1405/1395 Rest Point Road, Variances, to allow the Applicants time to <br />revise their plans, and to extend the 60 day review period. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#12) #2557 JUDITH AND DANIEL MCATHIE, 1449 BAY RIDGE ROAD - VARIANCES. <br />11:50 p.m.-11:56 p.m. <br />JudiU and Daniel McAthie, Applicants, were present. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit the addition of a garage <br />Page 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.