My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 10:17:08 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 10:06:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />r <br />L»... <br />t <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />AUGUST 21,2000 <br />Lindquist commented the Planning Commission is looking at some ver>* small lot sizes, noting he <br />cannot support a project with those lot sizes. Lindquist noted there is a i^ir amount of opposition <br />from the residents of Long Lake to the extension of Apple Glen Road. <br />Hawn concurred that there is not a lot of support for the extension of Apple Glen Road among the <br />residents of Long Lake. <br />Kluth commented the minutes reflect that the Planning Commission has e.xpressed concerns on a <br />number of occasions regarding the small lot size, with a recommendation being given to lower the <br />number of lots in this development. <br />Hawn commented the amount of dry buildable was mcreased slightly. <br />Lindquist indicated the size of the lots still remain relatively small, and reiterated he would not be <br />in support of the development as proposed. <br />Stoddard noted he was in agreement with Lindquist. <br />Kluth noted the City Council minutes reflect that hookup to sewer would not be allowed if it <br />increased lot density, noting the City Council would prefer to see a uvo acre minimum. Kluth <br />pointed out the Applicant was requested to address the issues relating to dry buildable and access. <br />Bergh stated the overall average for the lots in this development are a little over two acres with <br />respect to the PRD. <br />Hawn commented that there are some minimum sizes that people tend to be interested in <br />regardless if the overall lot size is above the two acre minimum. <br />Lindquist stated the Planning Commission can either act on this application tonight, which in his <br />view it will be denied, or the Applicant can request the matter be tabled. <br />Bergh requested the Planning Commission act on the revised plan <br />Hawn moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend denial of Application U2S50, Charles <br />Van Eeckhout, 120 South Brown Road, due to the concerns expressed regarding access and <br />PAGE 13 <br />i <br />1 <br />t <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.