Laserfiche WebLink
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT <br />TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />Date: October 19.2000 <br />rnuntv: Hennepin <br />LGU: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />LGU Contact: JimHafiier_________________ <br />Name/tf:SaeaHill.WildhurstSite Phone#: (952)471-0590.x282 ___ <br />Location of Project: 117 23 _______Q7 ______SE 1/4 ofNW 1/4____Pf9P9.Hennepin <br />Township. Range, Section, Qff. Section. Lot/BIock, City, <br />TEP Members (and others) who reviewed project: <br />(Check if viewed project site) <br />(v^swCD: David Thai____________(x)BWSR: Doug Snvder______ <br />County <br />(X)LGU: JimHafiier <br />Other Wetland E^qierts present*. <br />TEP requested bv: CitvofOrono <br />1.Type of TEP determination requested {chtek tkost that <br />_x_ Delineation check <br />___Exemption Determination (WCA Exemption #___) <br />___NO'Loss Determination <br />___Replacement Plan <br />2.Description of Wetland with proposed impact: <br />a.Wetland Type (Circular 39) Type 1 (Cowar din) <br />b.Size of Proposed Impact (tenths of acre). <br />3.Have sequencing requirements been addressed?__yes __no <br />4.Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local wnter plan and/or the watershed district <br />plan, the metropolitan surface water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and local <br />comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance? Yes(x) No( ) <br />5.The project will affect the following wotland functions: <br />Functions <br />Fioodwater Storage <br />Nutrient Assimilation <br />Sediment Entrapment <br />Groundwater Recharge <br />Low Flow Augmentation <br />Aesthetics/Recreation <br />Shoreland Anchoring <br />Wildlife Habitat <br />Fisheries Habitat <br />Impact No Impact Imprsye <br />Plant/Animal Habitat <br />Commercial Uses <br />6.For replacement plan or no-loss detenninations, are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level? <br />Yes ( )No () <br />7.Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend approval of the activity proposed in item L? <br />Yes(x) No( ) <br />If no, why?__________________________—------------------------------- <br />8 SIGNATURES Of TEP decision is not a consensus, note with an asterisk and explain on the back of this pa^) <br />SWCD Repftsenttdve (Dale)-------(Date)LGU repf^ettadve tDate) <br />.tepfsf.new(ApriL 1997)