Laserfiche WebLink
V <br />WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT <br />TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />nate: October 19.2000 <br />rountv: Hennepin <br />T.fiT I: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />LGU Contart: run Hafaer <br />Project Name/i!?: Saga Hill. WUdhurst Site <br />Location of Project:__ll7 23 07 <br />Phone#: (952’)471-0590.x282 <br />SEl/4ofNWl/4 Qrono. <br />Township, Range, Section, Qtr. Section, Lot/Block, City. <br />TEP Members (and others) who reviewed project: <br />(Check if viewed project site) <br />( X ) swm: David Thill_____________( x ) BWSRj Doug Snvder______ <br />Hennepin <br />County <br />(x)T-GU: JimHafiter <br />Other "Wetland Experts present:. <br />TEP requested bv: City of Qrono <br />1.T>'pe of TEP determination requested (ditek those ihatt^pfy): <br />X Delineation check <br />___Exemption Determination (WCA Exemption #___) <br />___No-Loss Determination <br />___Replacement Plan <br />2.Description of Wetland with proposed impact: <br />a.WeUand Type (Circular 39) Type!(Cowardin) <br />b.Size of Proposed Impact (tenths of acre). <br />3,Have sequencing requirements been addressed?__yes ___no <br />4.Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district <br />plan, the metropolitan surface water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and local <br />comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance? Yes(x) No( ) <br />5.The project will affect the following wetland functions: <br />Functions <br />Floodwater Storage <br />Nutrient Assimilation <br />Sediment Entrapment <br />Groundwater Recharge <br />Low Flow Augmentation <br />Aesthetics/Recreation <br />Shoreland Anchoring <br />Wildlife Habitat <br />Fisheries Habitat <br />Plant/Airimal Habitat <br />Commercial Uses <br />Impact No Impact Improve <br />6.For replacement plan or no-Ioss determinations, are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level? <br />Yes()No( ) <br />7.Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend approval of the activity proposed in item 1.? <br />Yes(x)No() <br />If no, why?------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />8.SIGNATURES (if TEP decision is no' a consensus, note with an asterisk and explain on the back of this page) <br />% <br />October 19.2000 <br />SWCD Represtntative (D«e)BWSR Rqxtseniative (D*te)L(^ rcpreseicatitb (Date) <br />aitepfof.nov (April. 1997) <br />Hiak.