12-11-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Keeping the lot coverage at 15 percent may result in smaller homes but is more likely to result in fewer or smaller decks, patios, gazebos or pools. 4.Impacts on existing vegetation should be minimized wherever possible. 4a. The original lots 1,2, and 3 will be park in the proposed development. It will desirable to landscape the southern edge to buffer the park and road from Orono Orchard Drive. 4b. The stands of mature trees on the eastern portion of the site will be preserved as shown on the concept plan. No change needed. S.Residential setbacks. 5a. The originally approved Lot 1, Block 1 does not e.xist in the proposed plan. It will be replaced by MnDOT pond. 5b. The originally approved Lots 1,2,3,7,8,9,10 and 11, Block 2 all had rear yards abutting Orono Oaks Drive. The approved setbacks were 35 feet front/street, 50 feet rear and 10 feet side. All proposed lots abutting Orono Oaks Drive are proposed with the same setbacks. 5c. Lots 4, 5, 6, and 12 Block 2 had rear yards abutting the pond road or railroad right-of-way. The approved setbacks were 35 feet front/street, 35 feet rear and 10 feet side. All proposed lots abutting the pond trail will have the same setbacks. The rear yard setbacks for the lots abutting the proposed Highway 12 right- of-way are shown at 50 feet to accommodate minor changes in the right-of-way and/or to provide additional space along this highway. 6.The amended fuial covenants will need to include all revised and approved plans and attachments. 7.No change needed. 8.No change needed. However, limiting the monuments to 3 Vi feet in height significantly limits the design. As long as the monument is placed to not interfere with vehicular and pedestrian sight lines a slightly higher limit would allow more design flexibility, and would allow the monument to more clearly identify the project. 9.A-F, No change needed. 10.No change needed. 11.The original Outlot A includes the pond and parts of the adjacent site. If a trail or other passive park facilities (ie. ben.hes) were to be developed around the pond/s crossing the edges of Outlot A may be necessary. 12.No change needed. 13.No change needed. 14.This proposal does not include any lots that have building pad conflicts with the existing sanitary sewer forcemain. It may not be necessary to relocate the forcemain to the proposed roadway. Please call at 612-339-3300 if you have questions or comments regarding this information. Thanks, Wally Case ot/jobs/4236/covrev.wpd 12/6/2000 Page 2