Laserfiche WebLink
-- '* . .\ ^y .- r^'r^t>><'.’^^^^ 'V- r* F-o *>»v»;—;'•* . ■• mm^ , ■••• •..V •' .•i • 3:“;* • *- •'• V p-' •» *•* rTzT*-* ^'.r.. V.'V <br />i- - <br />Zoning Files 49<;i, ?5»-;6 & *951 <br />August 14, 1935 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Tracts ?. & 0 have contained docks since the early 60's. Each ccck, as <br />with the others, r.feintain a zero lot line setback. Both doc.<s <br />each one sail boat over 16 feet stored for the sujrrr.er season.^ <br />knowledce there has never been another boat kept at these doc.ts. .ract Q <br />& P are'the land tracts providing a parking space ..or each owner. ,-.ccesj <br />tc these tracts are via Dick Ogle's property to the south. <br />b) Donald C. Cook <br />Tne <br />tract <br />owner <br />Cook has owned Tract E, a riparian tract since ^979 or I9s-. <br />was originally owned by an adjacent land owner and when the sub^ec- <br />owner sold his homestead lot, the riparian tract was not includes ^he <br />sale but sold indeocndently to Cook. The covenants governing whe special <br />ownership co.-nbinaticns for the riparian tracts owned by adDacen. ia..o <br />owners expired in January of 1965- <br />Cook has maintained 1 boat over 16 feet in length at the <br />dock since his ownership. Cook docs not own the contiguous * <br />Dick Ogle owns Tract D. The land tracts serve as of ..-street * <br />car. Cook does not have sufficient dry land area to provide suitabi <br />oarking for one car. Cook is «ble to legally on Ccuns.y Roa- <br />this mav not be an arrangement that the City would wish to encourage. <br />these non-confor.minc uses are to be approved by the City, their use . in <br />no way pl<'.ce any unnecessary hazards or ris.<s in the use o. - ® P*”*" . <br />or create nuisances for the surrounding property owners or the genera i <br />public. It would be preferable for Cook to acquire the use o^ <br />off-street parking purposes but in light of the available parking o. j <br />cent County Road 19, it is difficult for the City to deny <br />permit to the applicant because of safety factors since the coex ^.a - <br />used for the past five years without mishap. Limits on the use c: appi - <br />cant's dock would result in an increase in safety - guerts to be picxed u? <br />at public landing areas rather than encourage additional parking c.. coun-y <br />Road 19. <br />c) John Thimmesh ^ e , -Thimmesh is the current owner of recently combined iracws S & <br />prooerty remained with the original owncr/devciopor's until <br />It was the request of a potential buyer to build a new doex that cc..jnence <br />this year long review process. Tract S har. had a zero lot xine coc *.* <br />many vears. The applicant asks if this property could be ownec goinwi> <br />with another individual. I have explained that this review may cs abi.sh <br />limits on the use of chtse docks so that joint ownership is ^ '• ^ * <br />He understands our coi\ccrn but also asks that the C11 y cons ic o r j <br />adjacent owner could maintain 2 beats in excess of the 16 foot <br />not encroach on adjacent dock areas or create hazards for <br />lagoon. I suggested that the City would be wary o. the co.-cntia- . <br />or lease the second slip and add to the packing congestion <br />the neighborhood. He advised that, this was not his intention bu. <br />had pl.anncd at some future date to acquire a collector typ- boa. i- <br />of 16 feet length. I advised Thimmesh to come hack at th.at time .o a..c. u <br />l;is original conditional use pcr.mit per Council approia.. <br />i •