10-23-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. «■ •- •' * ".•• .• >■"•. • -''K- ^‘ • ■■ . .-^' •■ • • • •! ■• ■■ :"■ •• V-.I ••/* •"-- r*a ^ • w «- * *^■jy's r-^\, •'.'.*■?t a*» ,••*•.•. *. • zT'- •r*. •. ^ Zoning Files ^941, ?945 S »951 August 14, 1935 Page 2 of 4 Tracts R & 0 have contained docks since the early 60's. Each c: with the others, r.dintain a zero let line setback. Both doc.<s r.a each one sail boat over 16 feet stored for the su-rr.er season.^^ knowledge there has never been another boat kept at these doc.es. & P are the land tracts providing a parking space for each owner, tc these tracts are via Dick Ogle's property to the south. ;ck, as I ve had / To r-.y racts Q Access b) Donald C. Cook Cook has owned Tract E, a riparian tract since 1979 or 193;. Tne tract was originally owned by an adjacent land owner and when the sj ]ec_ owner sold his homestead lot, the riparian tract was not inciudec Ta'7 sale but sold independently to Cook. The covenants governing .-he s^. . ownership combinations for the riparian tracts owned by ad^acen. xa..o owners expired in January of 1965. Cook has maintained 1 boat over 16 feet in length at the zero ijat line dock since his ownership. Cook docs not own the contiguous land _.racw D. Dick Ogle owns Tract □. The land tracts serve as of ..-street car. Cook does not have sufficient dry land area to provide o_i a i corking for one car. Cook is «ble to legally parx on Ccunwy P.oac 19 bt- this mav not be an arrangement that the City would wish to encourage. - these non-conforming uses ere to be approved by the City, their ‘ no way plaice any unnecessary hazards or ris.xs in the use o. ..he p.». - - or create nuisances for the surrounding property owners or the general public. It would bs preferable for Cook to acquire the use Ou Tra-- off-street parking purposes but in light of the available parxing on j cent County Road 19, it is difficult for the City to deny a conditio.nal u permit to the applicant because of safety factors si ice the ooc< -as - used for the past five years without mishap. Limits on the u.se c. ®P* ^ cant's dock would result in an increase in safety - gue.-ts to bo p.cxed up at public landing areas rather than encourage additional parxing c.. coun-/ Road 19. c) John Thimmesh _ , „ ^ e , - Thimmesh is the current owner of recently combined iC^TCts S & *. prooerty remained with the original owner/dcvciopor's ' V '’i It was the request of a potential buyer to build a new doex that cs..jnence this year long review process. Tract S har. had a zero lot line coex .o. mar.v veor.s. The applicant asks if this property could be > with another individual. I have explained that this review may cs.abx-s. limits on the use of thtsc docks so that joint ownership is He understands our concern but also asks that the ir-cth and adjacent owner could maintain 2 beats in excess of the 16 tv,< « not encroach on adjacent dock atoas or create hazard^s for rc^- lagoon. I suggested that the City would be wary o. ^hc co.-cntia- . or lease the second slip and add to the parking r we the neighborhood. He advised that, this was not. his inwcntion ‘ ‘‘ had cl.inr.od at some future date to acquire a collector type hoaw i.. -XwC.. of 16 feet length. I advised Thimmesh to come hack at th.it time .o a..onu liis original conditional use permit per Council approva-. I • i - I I • 1 f« I# t\ i « I 7# i ? 9r 4