My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
10-09-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:35:34 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:28:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />• • •A. <br />$B. <br />[ <br />k ' <br />t <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />• <br />wr' V. <br />F. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Hardcover in the 0-75' zone will not change as a result of the’addition. It will <br />remain at 9.1%. <br />Hardcover in the 75-250' zone will not change as a result of the addition. It <br />will remain at 29.0%. <br />The average lakeshore setback variance is justified by the conclusion that <br />existing views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners will not <br />be encroached upon by the proposed addition. <br />Lot coverage on the property is currently 8.8%, and will remain with the <br />proposed addition, meeting the standard 15% limitation. <br />Although the lot size is conforming with an area of approximately 1.5 acres, <br />nearly half of the lot is in the 0-75' setback zone. <br />The shape of the lot and the curve of the shoreline, as weH as the fact that <br />lake exists on both the north and east sides of the property are hardships that <br />are unique to the property. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variance will not adversely affect trafRc conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary ’ to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by <br />the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />1 <br />A <br />■u.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.