My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
09-11-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:27:49 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:24:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Y‘ <br />f-y <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />(#2400 Mark and Arlette Ploen, Continued) <br />Weinberger staled the road would never be built up to the residence. Weinberger stated the <br />County could elect to condemn the property. <br />Hawn commented the two new lots would meet lot size but do not comply with the 140 fool <br />width front yard setback. <br />Stoddard inquired whether there were any precedents similar to this situation, <br />Weinberger stated this lot line rearrangement Is not increasing the housing density in this area, <br />but would allow the Applicant to create two lots meeting the one acre zoning requirement. <br />Weinberger stated these two lots would continue to be considered two housing units. <br />Hawn stated In her view meeting the required lot size Is an important factor to consider In this <br />application. <br />Smith inquired whether the Applicants are agreeable to the other conditions recommended by <br />City Staff. <br />Mr. Ploen indicated they are agreeable to the conditions. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application, <br />Smith moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2400, <br />4345/4365 North Shore Drive, Class I Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, subject <br />to the five conditions outlined in the January 12, 2000 Planner's Report and further <br />subject to removal of the garage located closest to Lot B. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Mrs. Ploen inquired when the garage would need to be removed. <br />Weinberger indicated six months from the time of approval would be fine, <br />(#3) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, SUBDIVISION FOR <br />PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 7:32 p.m. -8:23 p.m. <br />Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Charles Van Eeckhout. Applicant, was present, along with John Berg, Loucks & Associates. <br />Weinberger staled this application was reviewed at the November Planning Commission meeting, <br />where the application was denied due to the number of issues to be resolved and concerns <br />regarding DNR permits for sewer and driveway extension across Long Lake Creek, a protected <br />waterway. <br />The Applicant has submitted a revised plan for the subdivision to create an open space south <br />of the creek, which eliminates any concerns with crossing the creek as well as concerns <br />regarding bridging and extension of the sewer line across the creek. The DNR has requested <br />the developer dedicate a conservation easement along the south boundary of the property to <br />help preserve the natural area along the Luce Line Trail. <br />As it relates to sewer access to the Fox Ridge neighborhood, the best option would be to have <br />Page 8 <br />kJhirfii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.