My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:28:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Review <br />The property is a developed 5.1 acre property that is proposed to be subdivided to create a second <br />2.0 acre building site north of the existing house. The existing lot was platted as part of the <br />Underhill Farms Addition in 1976. A pond is located on proposed Lot 2. A Flowage and <br />Conservation Easement was granted at the time the Underhill Farms Addition was recorded. <br />Lot Standards <br />Lot 1 would be the new building site and would meet the minimum lot size and width for lots in the <br />RR-IB Zoning District. The site plans submitted by Mark Gronberg indicate the building pad is <br />located within required setbacks and all setbacks are met to the drainfield sites as depicted on the <br />survey. <br />The lot would share a driveway with Lot 2. An easement would be granted in favor of Lot 2 for <br />access over Lot 1. The minimum setbacks for the property would be 50’ from the road right-of-way, <br />30’ from interior lot lines. Please note the site plan indicating the building pad on the property, <br />attached Exhibit G. <br />There is an existing storage building that would be located on Lot 1. The building should be given <br />a reasonable term to remain standing without a principal building. <br />Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack and would not be permitted access to County Road <br />6.The property owners would prefer to use the existing driveway that would be on Lot 2. A second <br />driveway would require removal of mature trees along the road. The existing driveway was designed <br />with the orientation of the existing house. A separate driveway for proposed Lot 2 would make <br />maneuvering a vehicle to access the garage difficult. Both properties shall enter into a Maintenance <br />Agreement that would describe each lot owners responsibility for maintenance. <br />It is possible Hennepin County may have additional requirements for that portion of property located <br />along County Road 6. <br />Lot Dimensions <br />Lot Summaries:Total Acres Acres <br />Required <br />Lot Width <br />Required <br />Lot Width <br />Proposed <br />Lot 1 3.1 Ac. 2.7 dr>'2.0 Ac.200’200’ <br />Lot 2 2.0 Ac.2.0 Ac.200’364 ’ <br />Total 5.1 Ac. <br />Both lots meet all requirements for subdivision. <br />#2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham <br />1065 Tamarack Drive <br />Preliminary Subdivision <br />July 17, 2000 <br />page-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.