Laserfiche WebLink
p- <br />problem condition in proportion to runoff volumes generated by their land. <br />The method of allocating costs for the project should account for this <br />variable. <br />The proposed methoo .^cost allocation is based on the volume of runoff generated above <br />an estimated baseline condition reflective of open, undeveloped land. Table 1 shows how <br />application of this method allocates the total costs of the project among the watershed <br />residents within each City: <br />Table 1 - Approximate Project Cost Allocation Based on <br />Equivalent Runoff <br />City <br />City Watershed Land Use Runoff Net Runoff <br />Coeff.* <br />Equivalent Cost <br />Area (acres)Coeff.Proportion Share <br />Plymouth 245 ■“SFR^0.27 .17 80.9%$153,700- <br />¥ <br />m <br />75 Estate Res.0.17 .07 $230,600 <br />• <br />Medina 125 Estate Res.0.17 .07 15.1%$28,700- <br />$43,000 <br />Orono 52 Rural Res.0.14 .04 4.0%$7,600- <br />3 Estate Res.0.17 .07 $11,400 <br />ToUds 500 100%$190,000- <br />$285,000 <br />f ' <br />kr <br />' Net Runoff Coefficient = Runoff Coefficient for specified land use minus Runoff Coefficient <br />for open undeveloped land (.10) <br />^ SFR = single family residential <br />r <br />Mooney Lake Outlet <br />Feasibility Study